From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr (pegase2.c-s.fr [93.17.235.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D9AC2ED; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 08:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.235.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730968850; cv=none; b=rc3wDV/1YmCbS3zIXcjXb+Q6IChZII4Vv0Yh4IokZ81vvcG+0ARKRpxAkvDuZx7QbRqU9DzbB7WNPBN+hihTHAyreRxoa83rcLrAJPdxINTUU4pwBHfAqYunCfmhqRIDL6TLxT4ZxDemKd++YrOOblOvNhO+FCPuxnRU/16OmkY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730968850; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dfX6ZtwUHZN8F9lm+8DQLv5vlRp02eAi52yaIi5m5zk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Et37zySH4H5asS7qaljPVQyY1MFC0z7OPbwPfq08Y1KfYvSQjcPXSNECxXkMJrVEdewTge96Jq6u9HdVLdpQlNd6bXvAPgGPJjA771iQpoBRpSOfwNGuT2gcP7CeWNGzQx08TUmbRv/J4A3274yuW9uToQrB0vOg6vzeFyDBGoY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.235.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [172.26.127.67]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XkbBQ54sGz9sSK; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr ([172.26.127.65]) by localhost (pegase2.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JflxZQI1qNZ1; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase2.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XkbBM039Wz9sSL; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BA28B77B; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:42 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id v5yKCZ6xmeMy; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.232.148] (unknown [192.168.232.148]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC908B77A; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1a97751d-7e41-4b1b-84e8-3e1bd6aaef58@csgroup.eu> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:40:41 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: vDSO: Do not rely on $ARCH for vdso_test_getrandom && vdso_test_chacha To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Adhemerval Zanella , Xi Ruoyao , broonie@kernel.org References: Content-Language: fr-FR From: Christophe Leroy In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Jason, Le 01/09/2024 à 15:22, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > Hmm, I'm not so sure I like this very much. I think it's important for > these tests to fail when an arch tries to hook up the function to the > vDSO, but it's still not exported for some reason. This also regresses > the ARCH=x86_64 vs ARCH=x86 thing, which SRCARCH fixes. I was surprised today to discover that you finaly pushed something more or less similar. Did you change your mind ? Christophe