From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: fix phys_to_virt() false positive on tag-based kasan
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:35:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ac7eb3e-156f-218c-8c5a-39a05dd46d55@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819142238.2jobs6vabkp2isg2@willie-the-truck>
On 19/08/2019 15:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 04:05:22PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:34 PM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:56:26PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 07:44:20PM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
>>>>>> __arm_v7s_unmap() call iopte_deref() to translate pyh_to_virt address,
>>>>>> but it will modify pointer tag into 0xff, so there is a false positive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When enable tag-based kasan, phys_to_virt() function need to rewrite
>>>>>> its original pointer tag in order to avoid kasan report an incorrect
>>>>>> memory corruption.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. Which tree did you see this on? We've recently queued a load of fixes
>>>>> in this area, but I /thought/ they were only needed after the support for
>>>>> 52-bit virtual addressing in the kernel.
>>>>
>>>> I'm seeing similar issues in the virtio blk code (splat below), atop of
>>>> the arm64 for-next/core branch. I think this is a latent issue, and
>>>> people are only just starting to test with KASAN_SW_TAGS.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the virtio blk code will round-trip a SLUB-allocated pointer from
>>>> virt->page->virt, losing the per-object tag in the process.
>>>>
>>>> Our page_to_virt() seems to get a per-page tag, but this only makes
>>>> sense if you're dealing with the page allocator, rather than something
>>>> like SLUB which carves a page into smaller objects giving each object a
>>>> distinct tag.
>>>>
>>>> Any round-trip of a pointer from SLUB is going to lose the per-object
>>>> tag.
>>>
>>> Urgh, I wonder how this is supposed to work?
>>>
>>> If we end up having to check the KASAN shadow for *_to_virt(), then why
>>> do we need to store anything in the page flags at all? Andrey?
>>
>> As per 2813b9c0 ("kasan, mm, arm64: tag non slab memory allocated via
>> pagealloc") we should only save a non-0xff tag in page flags for non
>> slab pages.
>
> Thanks, that makes sense. Hopefully the patch from Andrey R will solve
> both of the reported splats, since I'd not realised they were both on the
> kfree() path.
>
>> Could you share your .config so I can reproduce this?
>
> This is in the iopgtable code, so it's probably pretty tricky to trigger
> at runtime unless you have the write IOMMU hardware, unfortunately.
If simply freeing any entry from the l2_tables cache is sufficient, then
the short-descriptor selftest should do the job, and that ought to run
on anything (modulo insane RAM layouts).
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 11:44 Walter Wu
2019-08-19 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 13:23 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 13:34 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 14:05 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-19 14:22 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 14:35 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-08-19 14:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-19 15:03 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 15:37 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-08-19 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 14:06 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-08-19 14:21 ` Walter Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ac7eb3e-156f-218c-8c5a-39a05dd46d55@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®