From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855C8CA9EB7 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6653E20659 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729964AbfJUQoE (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:44:04 -0400 Received: from [217.140.110.172] ([217.140.110.172]:58092 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726819AbfJUQoD (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:44:03 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859F1175D; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.105] (unknown [10.1.196.105]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0929D3F71F; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt To: Lei Wang Cc: Borislav Petkov , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "sashal@kernel.org" , "hangl@microsoft.com" , "lewan@microsoft.com" , "ruizhao@microsoft.com" , "scott.branden@broadcom.com" , "yuqing.shen@broadcom.com" , "ray.jui@broadcom.com" References: <20190923161015.GI15355@zn.tnic> <41637032-a308-9a92-1b49-cb51af2580f8@outlook.com> From: James Morse Message-ID: <1ae9a840-d5b6-ccd6-8481-d43665b4411b@arm.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:43:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Lei, On 18/10/2019 21:08, Lei Wang wrote: > This thread hasn't got traction from DT owners. It looks like your patches didn't make it to the mailing list: https://lore.kernel.org/r/BY5PR04MB6599EAA659A53B2331CB812586890@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com You can search on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/, I can only see the replies from the people who received it directly. I can't see anything obvious in the headers that would cause it to get rejected. Did you get any bounces/errors from the list? Depending on how the DT folk work, this may be why you haven't had a response yet. Tools like patchwork will depend on the message reaching the list. > James did give ACK before. > Should that be good enough? Nope! You need someone from the maintainer's entry for those files to review it. I gave my R-B as what you'd done made sense from the TRM and the driver. The DT folk will have a wider view and may have some advice. Thanks, James