mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de>
To: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Fix partially uninitialized integer in emulate_pop
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 13:48:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b0252b29c19cc08c41e1b58b26fbcf1f3fb06e4.camel@cyberus-technology.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZR1_lizQd14pbXbg@google.com>

On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 08:07 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> > Most code gives a pointer to an uninitialized unsigned long as dest in
> > emulate_pop. len is usually the word width of the guest.
> > 
> > If the guest runs in 16-bit or 32-bit modes, len will not cover the
> > whole unsigned long and we end up with uninitialized data in dest.
> > 
> > Looking through the callers of this function, the issue seems
> > harmless, but given that none of this is performance critical, there
> > should be no issue with just always initializing the whole value.
> > 
> > Fix this by explicitly requiring a unsigned long pointer and
> > initializing it with zero in all cases.
> 
> NAK, this will break em_leave() as it will zero RBP regardless of how many
> bytes
> are actually supposed to be written.  Specifically, KVM would incorrectly
> clobber
> RBP[31:16] if LEAVE is executed with a 16-bit stack.

Thanks, Sean! Great catch. I didn't see this. Is there already a test suite for
this?

> I generally like defense-in-depth approaches, but zeroing data that the caller
> did not ask to be written is not a net positive.

I'll rewrite the patch to just initialize variables where they are currently
not. This should be a bit more conservative and have less risk of breaking
anything.

Julian

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-05 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 13:38 Julian Stecklina
2023-10-04 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: rename push to emulate_push for consistency Julian Stecklina
2023-10-04 15:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Fix partially uninitialized integer in emulate_pop Sean Christopherson
2023-10-05 13:48   ` Julian Stecklina [this message]
2023-10-06  0:56     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-06  9:04       ` Julian Stecklina
2023-10-09  9:20 ` [PATCH v2 " Julian Stecklina
2023-10-09  9:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: rename push to emulate_push for consistency Julian Stecklina
2024-02-09  0:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Fix partially uninitialized integer in emulate_pop Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b0252b29c19cc08c41e1b58b26fbcf1f3fb06e4.camel@cyberus-technology.de \
    --to=julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome