From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B273C28CC0 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 16:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E625D91 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 16:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727624AbfE3Qhd (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 12:37:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39500 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726045AbfE3Qhd (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2019 12:37:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0180341; Thu, 30 May 2019 09:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.194.37] (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5CFE3F5AF; Thu, 30 May 2019 09:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 5/7] RISC-V: entry: Remove unneeded need_resched() loop To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org References: From: Valentin Schneider Message-ID: <1b251faf-0b5b-2972-1bfd-9d40a8fd3609@arm.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:37:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30/05/2019 05:09, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: [...] > > Sorry I missed this the first time around. > > Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt > > Do you want this through the RISC-V tree, or are you going to take it? Thanks! It's a standalone change so this would be fine through your tree.