From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31BF7442C for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 18:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759515960; cv=none; b=I22R4dq4jDWF1HXXNgKtNqWBTSqo9YZ3J3KaDD74WcKLYMbOLlfJWyGZkfsez3F02pHjvL2UMyBYdz7WPPHXMC8wq7bHXH0wkBvOilujfO/g+/E5kiA10VMXoArU6Bj5Y0F5oOUvHoEkSeb0d0WPY53wdCzgin/3fmmna8dORO4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759515960; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LActVDNHHJ01+cVP7NdYblEaRaHfOE6w3rkfKjPwdu0=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Syn4KPKPHeV6CoAmlT7JRwdC2MWCHMLZ6Wk5ss5P3F5mAc+g2QZLgmzHJFce+rEUJi8APUhznJ0Pre3jdgd/fn+NujV45OwUgF+Pz6KbfI3MxG0vhrTVvG729RCegAXFfDWQbOG/fdUJEnFb5Mht8tSy5+P52cpMt+CYoKiqgE8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=i37GG8P2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="i37GG8P2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1759515957; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LActVDNHHJ01+cVP7NdYblEaRaHfOE6w3rkfKjPwdu0=; b=i37GG8P2YTAVSmZ+cj1CiEPOtjhTn52e1RvFqS35ZUfUtbGHRBWPLaudRcjgvCEpY0Yccw cofY3vCqwmpQxU039bkZXu7g2a3BiJfkEZagZFvK0mdDbpp6XlsLvmWGlMGOePKpV3dyRz SwhKmIZ4hbVCjRGcQ/bfQ0QIe6AJ6zE= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-593-XzvITU9kMdyddvC54sYXOw-1; Fri, 03 Oct 2025 14:25:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XzvITU9kMdyddvC54sYXOw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: XzvITU9kMdyddvC54sYXOw_1759515955 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4dfe8dafd18so106687051cf.0 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:25:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759515955; x=1760120755; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LActVDNHHJ01+cVP7NdYblEaRaHfOE6w3rkfKjPwdu0=; b=Tml+dQZxkI//++TgTxUxPD9Xzh+MWdtpnGc08VKnyVF1toUzT7/bhjuk5QRMocEzN7 3LjPx9Onj0FGqHZIcqnLUOnp2/jF3tpRcPfDwOWLq3QxRLTDILMhWXAyuG6vttDL7avR ugLCVkED0IIaF3S1RiQp9pEw4S5clBz+8+ZfhEcrgkFOD454QJjK1o10yvipbJCtDm5o 2hgnUQZZw+66WsQt+d4rGbQ4pUHlFrqyHdm93LeEdWwBRw57Zcq9dxu98quizIW7VQUI QcB0Sjn/HmaR0jEqvs0LBXAOvNHvhvVwAC58t5jpVRBkTAWjBuAv6C5xPtwToiRQtuNp RJmg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUVzzomCjRKK7qxH8O6qvya+Rm2tMiPk93+I04tbLtkf68A552uyzk/pAGLnDpREbLax1BpBssPYASOWjk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0Sd6hkfFRHn+j3KuAkMjOOuq8IUjuk5zniFxmqEQc5TFp/s0K /2VTCYpeTe8gb39IvmCWxR0bZwnlLBaK59x3YVp6ev+YXvj+H71r2I9JR/yKJ8Wu3TZmcpZUWvd LeZdC9m8T0G9LhxepA+JB6FscfzOTUfqulXIKZGkiNOi5RjFiUeI7Al78/brDpjJbjA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvqMDIBHHPVFapEJ5qC9wuFM0k/RrSTenr1PI4MxCCS/cq9rOs3cNmy2+guf90 aQrGXHTU/1j6HVXXc9SpyRnpMktTW+Bh6g73f7Bcv5n/JuYAeu2iWOPM4gTXpb7eBRbwZp5XfjC qeULsNEQfuN3v/o5B5hegWeTlPPqj87coB4iq3fcwCyOdaZH45yZXlKAXgQLR/bFQHSpyJoOORT waZjOA06zMGSHryGLFSf7ZUbw4KXhUBOkGEFz4J8xk9SOTqaBjm34rsg1t+YnPwH2hFBLobdiu4 gO1/QqF5sq26dvAiKDaumt32h0rc/aa4cy/aG7keSPlr84FaI9A5TVZX6xVul6PkbQBej7tyAA= = X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:420b:b0:4de:5adb:20df with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4e576b49fc9mr51800351cf.75.1759515955463; Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:25:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHl6MbKs3Xb6exRfHKs8R/8W88faZKEv/f6HSCYFxtPk4/rUynv2mK5zOAipf0zbQgK3MTWtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:420b:b0:4de:5adb:20df with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4e576b49fc9mr51799931cf.75.1759515954967; Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crwood-thinkpadp16vgen1.minnmso.csb ([50.145.183.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-878bdf52afcsm44134596d6.46.2025.10.03.11.25.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b3684b424af051b5cb1fbce9ab65fc5cdf2b1a1.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/manage: Reduce priority of forced secondary IRQ handler From: Crystal Wood To: Lukas Wunner , Thomas Gleixner Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt , Dietmar Eggemann , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Attila Fazekas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Bjorn Helgaas , Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Oliver OHalloran Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 13:25:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <83f58870043e2ae64f19b3a2169b5c3cf3f95130.1757346718.git.lukas@wunner.de> <87348g95yd.ffs@tglx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-1.fc42) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sun, 2025-09-21 at 15:12 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I obviously understand that the proposed change squashs the whole class > > of similar (not yet detected) issues, but that made me look at that > > particular instance nevertheless. > >=20 > > All aer_irq() does is reading two PCI config words, writing one and the= n > > sticking 64bytes into a KFIFO. All of that is hard interrupt safe. So > > arguably this AER problem can be nicely solved by the below one-liner, > > no? >=20 > The one-liner (which sets IRQF_NO_THREAD) was what Crystal originally > proposed: >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250902224441.368483-1-crwood@redhat.com/ So, is the plan to apply the original patch then? Thanks, Crystal