mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>,
	Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvdimm/pmem: Release gendisk on probe failure
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:04:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b8631c6-5359-4021-a307-f3b58cfa3f9d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911082543.473670-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com>



On 9/11/26 1:25 AM, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> pmem_attach_disk() allocates the gendisk with blk_alloc_disk() and hands
> it to devres only once device_add_disk() has succeeded.  Until that
> point the probe path owns the disk itself, which is why every failure
> after the allocation jumps to the out: label and puts it there.
> 
> The devm_init_badblocks() failure returns directly instead, so the disk
> allocated a few lines earlier is never released.  Nothing releases it
> afterwards either: the devres action that would have done so has not
> been registered yet, so unbinding the namespace or destroying it does
> not reach the disk, and it stays allocated along with its queue and its
> bdev inode until the machine is rebooted.
> 
> devm_init_badblocks() only fails when a single page allocation fails, so
> reaching this at all needs memory exhaustion during namespace probe, and
> because device_add_disk() has not run there is nothing user visible left
> behind: no device node, no sysfs entry, only the leaked memory.
> 
> Release the gendisk through the existing cleanup path on this failure.
> 
> Fixes: 3dd60fb9d95d ("nvdimm/pmem: stop using q_usage_count as external pgmap refcount")
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>

> ---
> v2, all of it from Alison's review of v1:
>  - retitled, and the changelog rewritten as background, problem, impact
>    and resolution rather than a walk through the call sequence
>  - says whether the disk is permanently leaked: it is, because the
>    devres action has not been registered at that point, so no later
>    unbind or destroy reaches it
>  - says when the failure can be reached at all, and that nothing user
>    visible is left behind
>  - the Fixes: tag re-derived.  v1 blamed b95f5f4391fa, but the early
>    return after the disk was allocated already existed before it; that
>    commit only changed which call failed.  The leak starts at
>    3dd60fb9d95d, which removed the pmem_release_queue devres action and
>    the fsdax_pagemap_ops .cleanup that had been freeing the disk on
>    these paths.  accf58afb689 then converted the addr and dax_dev
>    returns to goto out, and this one was missed.
>  - the object counts kept, but measured across four batch sizes so that
>    the scaling is visible, and the shortfall you noticed explained
> 
> Found by an AI-assisted review of the error paths in pmem_attach_disk().
> 
> Tested on 7.3.0-rc2 in QEMU, with a legacy pmem region (memmap=1G!2G) and
> a local debug patch forcing the devm_init_badblocks() branch, as it is
> otherwise only reachable under memory exhaustion.  namespace0.0 was bound
> and unbound repeatedly with the branch forced, counting bdev_cache in
> /proc/slabinfo after a drop_caches and a settle:
> 
>     failed probes      32     64    128    256
>     growth, unfixed   +24    +60   +120   +252
>     growth, fixed     +12    +12    +12    +12
> 
> Without the patch the count tracks the number of failed probes, and the
> unbind between attempts does not bring it back down, which is what makes
> the leak permanent.  With the patch it is flat.  Both rows sit a little
> under the probe count because SLUB's active_objs is an estimate, which is
> the discrepancy you asked about in v1.  Clearing the debug flag and
> binding again still gives a working /dev/pmem0.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260824060113.2330468-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com/
> 
>  drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
> index 30a51c365ce8..648fc7d66063 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
> @@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev,
>  	nvdimm_namespace_disk_name(ndns, disk->disk_name);
>  	set_capacity(disk, (pmem->size - pmem->pfn_pad - pmem->data_offset)
>  			/ 512);
> -	if (devm_init_badblocks(dev, &pmem->bb))
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (devm_init_badblocks(dev, &pmem->bb)) {
> +		rc = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  	nvdimm_badblocks_populate(nd_region, &pmem->bb, &bb_range);
>  	disk->bb = &pmem->bb;
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11  8:25 Hemanth Selam
2026-09-18 17:04 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-10-02  1:40 ` Alison Schofield
2026-10-23 16:11   ` Christophe JAILLET
2026-10-23 16:42     ` Alison Schofield
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-31  4:34 Hemanth Selam
     [not found] ` <20260831044508.520351F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-08-31  5:02   ` Hemanth Selam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1b8631c6-5359-4021-a307-f3b58cfa3f9d@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=hemanth.selam@gmail.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®