From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753308Ab1HXVBd (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:01:33 -0400 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:35294 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752042Ab1HXVBc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:01:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1b9107c1-20a3-4e2c-9d83-6449857fb514@default> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Magenheimer To: Konrad Wilk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, hughd@google.com, ngupta@vflare.org, JBeulich@novell.com, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@kernel.dk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, riel@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, matthew@wil.cx, Chris Mason , sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jackdachef@gmail.com, cyclonusj@gmail.com Subject: RE: [PATCH V7 0/4] mm: frontswap: overview (and proposal to merge at next window) References: <20110823145735.GA23160@ca-server1.us.oracle.com 20110824205355.GD27865@dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20110824205355.GD27865@dumpdata.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.4.1.0 (410211) [OL 12.0.6557.5001] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.4E55669C.0060,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/4] mm: frontswap: overview (and proposal to merge at next window) > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:57:35AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > [PATCH V7 0/4] mm: frontswap: overview (and proposal to merge at next window) > > Is there a git branch of these patches? I'll get V7 into linux-next in a day or two (assuming someone else doesn't find a glaring problem before then which would require a V8). Linux-next currently has V6. > Also, on a unrelated note - your patches have 'Subject: Subject: [PATCH..' > - you might want to fix your fancy mail sending tools. Sigh, sorry. It's an artifact of my use of "git am". I thought I had fixed it in my scripts after a trial send to myself, but neglected to move the changed script to my external-email-sending machine. Dan