mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	yi.zhu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem: Out of memory after 2days with 2GB RAM
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:35:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240806120935r54a080eci7fa6fafc718eed17@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240806120843s268b2ff4mb45a11adf11afc7f@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:38 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:07:34 +0200
>>> "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > It looks like while there was a huge amount of buffers and caches -
>>> > system was unable to allocate few pages for kmalloc in iwl3945 driver
>>> > after resume.
>>>
>>> It looks like this is because it wants to allocate 2**5 contiguous
>>> pages, which is 128kB of contiguous kernel memory.
>>
>> 64-bit system I assume?
>> The allocation should be 256 * 20 * sizeof(struct sk_buff *).
>
>> Try the patch below. It should improve code generation too.
>>
>> I discussed this with Tomas previously and he says the hw is capable of
>> doing 20 fragments per frame (wonder why, Broadcom can do an unlimited
>> number...) but he complained about the networking stack not being able
>> to.
>
> This is scatter gather buffers that can be kicked in one DMA transaction.
>
> Well, the hardware needs to support IP checksumming for that, hence,
>> afaik, only two fragments can ever be used (one for hw header, one for
>> frame)
> This I still don't understand why but everybody is already tired to
> explaining me why.. :) Just need to find time to dig into it.
>
>> This cuts the allocation to 10%, or (under) a page in all cases.
>
> Probably. it would be safe to use vmalloc for allocating txb anyway.
> I'll give it a try.

So vmalloc  didn't break anything on the 32bit machine I'm just about
to install 64 one so it will take hour or two.. I will issue some
official patch after that.

> There was already discussion on LKML about memory allocation problems
> on X86_64, which might explain this regression. This didn't happen
> before.

This is  the thread title if you are interested.
'x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY'

Tomas

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-12 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-12 10:07 Zdenek Kabelac
2008-06-12 13:38 ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-12 13:54   ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 14:12     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2008-06-12 14:19       ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 16:38       ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-12 15:43     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-12 16:35       ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-06-12 17:05         ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 17:39           ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-12 17:46             ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 18:03               ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-12 18:15                 ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 20:11                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2008-06-12 22:17                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-13  0:43                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-12 18:41               ` John W. Linville
2008-06-12 17:03       ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 17:35         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-12 17:39           ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-12 17:50             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-12 17:10       ` Rik van Riel
2008-06-12 21:30       ` Jiri Slaby
2008-06-12 22:26         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-13 14:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-13 14:15   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2008-06-30 11:30     ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ba2fa240806120935r54a080eci7fa6fafc718eed17@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tomasw@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®