From: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] uio_hv_generic: Let userspace take care of interrupt mask
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:22:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bb599ee-fe28-409d-b430-2fc086268936@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828080207.6d9d3426@hermes.local>
On 8/28/2025 8:32 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:12:00 +0530
> Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Remove the logic to set interrupt mask by default in uio_hv_generic
>> driver as the interrupt mask value is supposed to be controlled
>> completely by the user space. If the mask bit gets changed
>> by the driver, concurrently with user mode operating on the ring,
>> the mask bit may be set when it is supposed to be clear, and the
>> user-mode driver will miss an interrupt which will cause a hang.
>>
>> For eg- when the driver sets inbound ring buffer interrupt mask to 1,
>> the host does not interrupt the guest on the UIO VMBus channel.
>> However, setting the mask does not prevent the host from putting a
>> message in the inbound ring buffer. So let’s assume that happens,
>> the host puts a message into the ring buffer but does not interrupt.
>>
>> Subsequently, the user space code in the guest sets the inbound ring
>> buffer interrupt mask to 0, saying “Hey, I’m ready for interrupts”.
>> User space code then calls pread() to wait for an interrupt.
>> Then one of two things happens:
>>
>> * The host never sends another message. So the pread() waits forever.
>> * The host does send another message. But because there’s already a
>> message in the ring buffer, it doesn’t generate an interrupt.
>> This is the correct behavior, because the host should only send an
>> interrupt when the inbound ring buffer transitions from empty to
>> not-empty. Adding an additional message to a ring buffer that is not
>> empty is not supposed to generate an interrupt on the guest.
>> Since the guest is waiting in pread() and not removing messages from
>> the ring buffer, the pread() waits forever.
>>
>> This could be easily reproduced in hv_fcopy_uio_daemon if we delay
>> setting interrupt mask to 0.
>>
>> Similarly if hv_uio_channel_cb() sets the interrupt_mask to 1,
>> there’s a race condition. Once user space empties the inbound ring
>> buffer, but before user space sets interrupt_mask to 0, the host could
>> put another message in the ring buffer but it wouldn’t interrupt.
>> Then the next pread() would hang.
>>
>> Fix these by removing all instances where interrupt_mask is changed,
>> while keeping the one in set_event() unchanged to enable userspace
>> control the interrupt mask by writing 0/1 to /dev/uioX.
>>
>> Fixes: 95096f2fbd10 ("uio-hv-generic: new userspace i/o driver for VMBus")
>> Suggested-by: John Starks <jostarks@microsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>
> Makes sense. I think the logic got carried over from uio.
> Does it need to make sure interrupt is masked by default to avoid
> races at startup?
No, initially I also figured that this would be required, and that's why
this was added in the first place. But my experiments with userspace
told me otherwise and I don't think this is required.
Thanks.
Regards,
Naman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 4:42 Naman Jain
2025-08-28 15:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-29 5:52 ` Naman Jain [this message]
2025-08-29 14:17 ` Long Li
2025-08-31 16:12 ` Michael Kelley
2025-08-31 17:30 ` Tianyu Lan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bb599ee-fe28-409d-b430-2fc086268936@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®