From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] Documentation: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:14:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bb9d2f7-e20d-a0d9-c94f-328e1dc83323@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201028202804.3562179-5-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On 10/28/20 1:28 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Since #DB for bus lock detect changes the split_lock_detect parameter,
> update the documentation for the changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 47 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 526d65d8573a..51312484c2b6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5044,27 +5044,58 @@
> spia_peddr=
>
> split_lock_detect=
> - [X86] Enable split lock detection
> + [X86] Enable split lock detection or bus lock detection
>
> When enabled (and if hardware support is present), atomic
> instructions that access data across cache line
> - boundaries will result in an alignment check exception.
> + boundaries will result in an alignment check exception
> + for split lock detection or an debug exception for
> + bus lock detection.
>
> off - not enabled
>
> - warn - the kernel will emit rate limited warnings
> - about applications triggering the #AC
> - exception. This mode is the default on CPUs
> - that supports split lock detection.
> + warn - Default mode.
>
> - fatal - the kernel will send SIGBUS to applications
> - that trigger the #AC exception.
> + If split lock detection is enabled in
> + hardware, the kernel will emit rate limited
> + warnings about applications triggering the #AC
> + exception.
> +
> + If bus lock detection is enabled in hardware,
> + the kernel will emit rate limited warnings
> + about applications triggering the #DB
> + exception.
> +
> + Default behavior is from bus lock detection
> + if both features are enabled in hardware.
> +
> + fatal - If split lock detection is enabled in
> + hardware, the kernel will send SIGBUS to
> + applications that trigger the #AC exception.
> +
> + If bus lock detection is enabled in hardware,
> + the kernel will send SIGBUS to application
> + that trigger the #DB exception.
> +
> + Default behavior is from split lock detection
> + if both are enabled in hardware.
> +
Hi,
This appears to have quite a bit of duplicated lines....
> + ratelimit:N
> + Set rate limit to N bus locks per second
> + for bus lock detection. 0 < N <= HZ/2 and
> + N is approximate. Only applied to non root
> + user.
> +
> + N/A for split lock detection.
>
> If an #AC exception is hit in the kernel or in
> firmware (i.e. not while executing in user mode)
> the kernel will oops in either "warn" or "fatal"
> mode.
>
> + #DB exception for bus lock is triggered only when
> + CPL > 0.
> +
> srbds= [X86,INTEL]
> Control the Special Register Buffer Data Sampling
> (SRBDS) mitigation.
>
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-28 20:28 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate #DB for " Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB for bus lock Fenghua Yu
2020-10-29 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 19:39 ` Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit " Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] Documentation: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter Fenghua Yu
2020-10-29 5:14 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2020-10-30 19:42 ` Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bb9d2f7-e20d-a0d9-c94f-328e1dc83323@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®