mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] Documentation: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:14:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bb9d2f7-e20d-a0d9-c94f-328e1dc83323@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201028202804.3562179-5-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

On 10/28/20 1:28 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Since #DB for bus lock detect changes the split_lock_detect parameter,
> update the documentation for the changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 47 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 526d65d8573a..51312484c2b6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5044,27 +5044,58 @@
>  	spia_peddr=
>  
>  	split_lock_detect=
> -			[X86] Enable split lock detection
> +			[X86] Enable split lock detection or bus lock detection
>  
>  			When enabled (and if hardware support is present), atomic
>  			instructions that access data across cache line
> -			boundaries will result in an alignment check exception.
> +			boundaries will result in an alignment check exception
> +			for split lock detection or an debug exception for
> +			bus lock detection.
>  
>  			off	- not enabled
>  
> -			warn	- the kernel will emit rate limited warnings
> -				  about applications triggering the #AC
> -				  exception. This mode is the default on CPUs
> -				  that supports split lock detection.
> +			warn	- Default mode.
>  
> -			fatal	- the kernel will send SIGBUS to applications
> -				  that trigger the #AC exception.
> +				  If split lock detection is enabled in
> +				  hardware, the kernel will emit rate limited
> +				  warnings about applications triggering the #AC
> +				  exception.
> +
> +				  If bus lock detection is enabled in hardware,
> +				  the kernel will emit rate limited warnings
> +				  about applications triggering the #DB
> +				  exception.
> +
> +				  Default behavior is from bus lock detection
> +				  if both features are enabled in hardware.
> +
> +			fatal	- If split lock detection is enabled in
> +				  hardware, the kernel will send SIGBUS to
> +				  applications that trigger the #AC exception.
> +
> +				  If bus lock detection is enabled in hardware,
> +				  the kernel will send SIGBUS to application
> +				  that trigger the #DB exception.
> +
> +				  Default behavior is from split lock detection
> +				  if both are enabled in hardware.
> +

Hi,
This appears to have quite a bit of duplicated lines....

> +			ratelimit:N
> +				  Set rate limit to N bus locks per second
> +				  for bus lock detection. 0 < N <= HZ/2 and
> +				  N is approximate. Only applied to non root
> +				  user.
> +
> +				  N/A for split lock detection.
>  
>  			If an #AC exception is hit in the kernel or in
>  			firmware (i.e. not while executing in user mode)
>  			the kernel will oops in either "warn" or "fatal"
>  			mode.
>  
> +			#DB exception for bus lock is triggered only when
> +			CPL > 0.
> +
>  	srbds=		[X86,INTEL]
>  			Control the Special Register Buffer Data Sampling
>  			(SRBDS) mitigation.
> 


-- 
~Randy


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-29  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-28 20:28 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate #DB for " Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB for bus lock Fenghua Yu
2020-10-29  9:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 19:39     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit " Fenghua Yu
2020-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] Documentation: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter Fenghua Yu
2020-10-29  5:14   ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2020-10-30 19:42     ` Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1bb9d2f7-e20d-a0d9-c94f-328e1dc83323@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®