From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
To: "glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
"frank.li@vivo.com" <frank.li@vivo.com>,
"slava@dubeyko.com" <slava@dubeyko.com>,
"kartikey406@gmail.com" <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com"
<syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: fix uninit-value in hfsplus_strcasecmp
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 22:29:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bf327370c695a5ca6a56d287d75a19311246995.camel@ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120051114.1281285-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2026-01-20 at 10:41 +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Syzbot reported a KMSAN uninit-value issue in hfsplus_strcasecmp() during
> filesystem mount operations. The root cause is that hfsplus_find_cat()
> declares a local hfsplus_cat_entry variable without initialization before
> passing it to hfs_brec_read().
>
> If hfs_brec_read() doesn't completely fill the entire structure (e.g., when
> the on-disk data is shorter than sizeof(hfsplus_cat_entry)), the padding
> bytes in tmp.thread.nodeName remain uninitialized. These uninitialized
> bytes are then copied by hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() into the search key,
> and subsequently accessed by hfsplus_strcasecmp() during catalog lookups,
> triggering the KMSAN warning.
Frankly speaking, I don't quite follow what is wrong with current logic from
your explanation. Only, struct hfsplus_cat_thread contains nodeName string. And
hfsplus_strcasecmp() can try to compare some strings only for Catalog thread
type. But hfs_brec_read() should read namely only this type of Catalog File
record. So, I cannot imagine how likewise issue could happen. Could you explain
the issue more clearly? How uninitiliazed nodeName strings can be used for
comparison? How does it happened? Because, struct hfsplus_cat_thread is the
biggest item in hfsplus_cat_entry union. The struct hfsplus_cat_file and struct
hfsplus_cat_folder don't contain any strings and strings cannot be used for
comparison in these structures case. But struct hfsplus_cat_thread should be
read completely with the string.
>
> Fix this by zeroing the tmp variable before use to ensure all padding
> bytes are initialized.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d80abb5b890d39261e72
> Tested-by: syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/catalog.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c b/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c
> index 02c1eee4a4b8..9c75d1736427 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ int hfsplus_find_cat(struct super_block *sb, u32 cnid,
> u16 type;
>
> hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd->search_key, cnid);
> + memset(&tmp, 0, sizeof(tmp));
What's about of using initialization:
hfsplus_cat_entry tmp = {0};
instead of using memset()?
Thanks,
Slava.
> err = hfs_brec_read(fd, &tmp, sizeof(hfsplus_cat_entry));
> if (err)
> return err;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 5:11 Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-01-20 22:29 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2026-01-21 6:26 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-01-21 20:11 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-23 1:48 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-01-23 23:21 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-24 2:46 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-01-26 20:37 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-27 8:20 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-01-27 23:21 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-01-28 4:29 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-01-29 20:56 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bf327370c695a5ca6a56d287d75a19311246995.camel@ibm.com \
--to=slava.dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=syzbot+d80abb5b890d39261e72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®