From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mahesh Kumar <maheshkumar657g@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:58:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bf59095d87e5dfae8f019385ba3ce58973baaff.1741270780.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1741270780.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked
with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running
stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is
possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is
destroyed eg:
(umount)
ext4_kill_sb
kill_block_super
generic_shutdown_super
sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */
evict_inodes
/* might start a new txn */
ext4_put_super
flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */
jbd2_journal_destroy
journal_kill_thread
journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer
jbd2_journal_bmap
ext4_journal_bmap
ext4_map_blocks
...
ext4_inode_error
ext4_handle_error
schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)
/* work queue kicks in */
update_super_work
jbd2_journal_start
start_this_handle
BUG_ON(journal->j_flags &
JBD2_UNMOUNT)
Hence, introduce a new sbi flag s_journal_destroying to indicate journal is
destroying only do a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not
set. Otherwise, just fallback to an un-journaled commit.
We set sbi->s_journal_destroying = true only after all the FS updates are done
during ext4_put_super() (except a running transaction that will get commited
during jbd2_journal_destroy()). After this point, it is safe to commit the sb
outside the journal as it won't race with a journaled update (refer
2d01ddc86606).
Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only
called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.
Fixes: 2d01ddc86606 ("ext4: save error info to sb through journal if available")
Reported-by: Mahesh Kumar <maheshkumar657g@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 ++
fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 8 ++++++++
fs/ext4/super.c | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 2b7d781bfcad..d48e93bd5690 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1728,6 +1728,8 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
*/
struct work_struct s_sb_upd_work;
+ bool s_journal_destorying;
+
/* Atomic write unit values in bytes */
unsigned int s_awu_min;
unsigned int s_awu_max;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
index 9b3c9df02a39..6bd3ca84410d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
@@ -437,6 +437,14 @@ static inline int ext4_journal_destroy(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, journal_t *jour
{
int err = 0;
+ /*
+ * At this point all pending FS updates should be done except a possible
+ * running transaction (which will commit in jbd2_journal_destroy). It
+ * is now safe for any new errors to directly commit superblock rather
+ * than going via journal.
+ */
+ sbi->s_journal_destorying = true;
+
err = jbd2_journal_destroy(journal);
sbi->s_journal = NULL;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 8ad664d47806..31552cf0519a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void ext4_handle_error(struct super_block *sb, bool force_ro, int error,
* constraints, it may not be safe to do it right here so we
* defer superblock flushing to a workqueue.
*/
- if (continue_fs && journal)
+ if (continue_fs && journal && !EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal_destorying)
schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sb_upd_work);
else
ext4_commit_super(sb);
@@ -5311,6 +5311,8 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
spin_lock_init(&sbi->s_error_lock);
INIT_WORK(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work, update_super_work);
+ sbi->s_journal_destorying = false;
+
err = ext4_group_desc_init(sb, es, logical_sb_block, &first_not_zeroed);
if (err)
goto failed_mount3;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 14:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix a BUG_ON crashing the kernel in start_this_handle Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-06 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: define ext4_journal_destroy wrapper Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-07 14:05 ` Jan Kara
2025-03-08 1:18 ` Baokun Li
2025-03-06 14:28 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2025-03-07 2:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying Zhang Yi
2025-03-07 6:34 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-07 8:13 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-07 8:43 ` Zhang Yi
2025-03-07 10:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-07 12:36 ` Zhang Yi
2025-03-07 17:26 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 2:57 ` Zhang Yi
2025-03-08 8:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 9:58 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 10:10 ` Baokun Li
2025-03-08 12:57 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 10:01 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-07 14:26 ` Jan Kara
2025-03-07 17:00 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 9:55 ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-03-08 13:05 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 13:26 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-08 14:58 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 18:41 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-09 12:07 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-10 4:43 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-12 10:51 ` Jan Kara
2025-03-12 14:26 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-12 17:15 ` Jan Kara
2025-03-13 1:20 ` Zhang Yi
2025-03-13 2:08 ` Baokun Li
2025-03-12 13:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-03-12 14:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-06 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: Make sb update interval tunable Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 2:25 ` Baokun Li
2025-03-08 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix a BUG_ON crashing the kernel in start_this_handle Baokun Li
2025-03-08 13:07 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-08 15:21 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-03-10 3:10 ` Baokun Li
2025-03-10 7:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bf59095d87e5dfae8f019385ba3ce58973baaff.1741270780.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maheshkumar657g@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®