From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S2993081AbXBRCOd@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S2993081AbXBRCOd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:14:33 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993082AbXBRCOd
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:14:33 -0500
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:56812 "EHLO
	nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S2993081AbXBRCOc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:14:32 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=aoL1kcRj6r/rxye80+Ea11J9TueGdClMwmteCRg/3QX4GGM+wwX/SCtxWQxLXEudEN0KcKFlnLo/8xvBiLELtT7yDHyj3fuKczNqq85DBRFjogZe2i+LIMMTo5vTKGQ5oo8hj0rzvmo9w4NQoAMRjL9KOBKbwTt2MWEDnJMkPks=
Message-ID: <1c1c86360702171814m35265b01pe391df87d5f9db76@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:14:31 +1300
From: "mdew ." <some.nzguy@gmail.com>
To: "linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-ck1
In-Reply-To: <200702162110.03355.kernel@kolivas.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200702162110.03355.kernel@kolivas.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
>
> Apply to 2.6.20

any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?