From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com, mturquette@baylibre.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: clocks: atmel,at91rm9200-pmc: convert to yaml
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 09:58:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c2aa022-348a-8ac2-1a26-eedf57aadb77@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4d934c6-ec28-50d0-b9bb-9b11fee7ebb6@microchip.com>
On 10/05/2023 09:14, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
> On 10.05.2023 10:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 10/05/2023 09:00, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
>>> On 09.05.2023 09:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>>
>>>> On 09/05/2023 07:27, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>>>>> Convert Atmel PMC documentation to yaml. Along with it clock names
>>>>> were adapted according to the current available device trees as
>>>>> different controller versions accept different clocks (some of them
>>>>> have 3 clocks as input, some has 2 clocks as inputs and some with 2
>>>>> input clocks uses different clock names).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
>>>>
>>>>> +title: Atmel Power Management Controller (PMC)
>>>>> +
>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>> + - Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +description:
>>>>> + The power management controller optimizes power consumption by controlling all
>>>>> + system and user peripheral clocks. The PMC enables/disables the clock inputs
>>>>> + to many of the peripherals and to the processor.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +properties:
>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>> + oneOf:
>>>>> + - items:
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9g15-pmc
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9g20-pmc
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9g25-pmc
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9g35-pmc
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9x25-pmc
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9x35-pmc
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9260-pmc
>>>>> + - atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc
>>>>
>>>> I missed it last time - why you have two enums? We never talked about
>>>> this. It's usually wrong... are you sure this is real hardware:
>>>> atmel,at91sam9g20-pmc, atmel,at91sam9260-pmc
>>>> ?
>>>
>>> I have 2 enums because there are some hardware covered by:
>>> "vendor-name,hardware-v1-pmc", "syscon" and some covered by:
>>> "vendor-name,hardware-v2-pmc", "vendor-name,hardware-v1-pmc", "syscon".
>>
>> The enum does not say this. At all.
>>
>> So again, answer, do not ignore:
>> is this valid setup:
>> atmel,at91sam9g20-pmc, atmel,at91sam9260-pmc
>> ?
>
> Not w/o syscon. This is valid:
Syscon is not important here, but indeed I missed it.
>
> compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g20-pmc", "atmel,at91sam9260-pmc", "syscon";
>
> available in arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi +45
Nice, so my random choice was actually correct. Ok, so another:
atmel,at91sam9g15-pmc, atmel,at91sam9260-pmc, syscon
Is it valid hardware?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-10 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 5:27 [PATCH v3 0/5] dt-bindings: clocks: at91: " Claudiu Beznea
2023-05-09 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: dts: at91: use clock-controller name for PMC nodes Claudiu Beznea
2023-05-09 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: clocks: atmel,at91rm9200-pmc: convert to yaml Claudiu Beznea
2023-05-09 6:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-10 7:00 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2023-05-10 7:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-10 7:14 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2023-05-10 7:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-05-10 8:31 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2023-05-10 10:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-11 6:29 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2023-05-11 8:58 ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-12 7:59 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2023-05-09 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: dts: at91: at91sam9n12: witch sckc to new clock bindings Claudiu Beznea
2023-05-09 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: dts: at91: use clock-controller name for sckc nodes Claudiu Beznea
2023-05-09 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: clocks: at91sam9x5-sckc: convert to yaml Claudiu Beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c2aa022-348a-8ac2-1a26-eedf57aadb77@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®