From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6ACC3279B for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A6523E08 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="lBbqIwLz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 71A6523E08 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932540AbeGFNuA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:50:00 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com ([209.85.214.68]:54934 "EHLO mail-it0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754125AbeGFNt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:49:58 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id s7-v6so16577724itb.4 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 06:49:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9C3vQcIDK3Ji+dTrYx4zGuIY7nRiku9gy98G5yQbHWI=; b=lBbqIwLzK6Eqb/CzY7vCovKAZH5XmrHvhWJDZotJ5gxrmoYw4QcgPEXOELQRm4cbEj I8YIhvilg+I3gAzkXcU6TXh0wOOTsAnU8ywsXlQvxSbeeBRatveGeuE5Vyx0ToDSsWwe LAJ3GxStj9Q0QBqC2m34LMlKDyu3YJvsCX680HhZc7caxqTpScUv2C96oJ6/IYffqTsm OmEaNMBJWDX7vEA0eZtf7WLqqqT3eVAcsrORNg3+uEvMDogFwJrNrCihzn+nA3niSXiu usbC/0JBpefZ48l4uAXZi7nb2U5N8awqdvZoveiFi7FklBNgShbcLOgqDZ2Tzm8duMcZ Bjkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9C3vQcIDK3Ji+dTrYx4zGuIY7nRiku9gy98G5yQbHWI=; b=BeWweTzXMGe5kBzE5S/4aa57ThAJbCbyFUovp6z8TN/VYOFMnHpbqNuYgDakqJE2yZ 7xShupgM/8JNoWo/uHTQlcN2V3zrThxPuyN/y2+bcef5NSIvux7NsOrdUNJWDRt0vyVE iIXeCdIvwBz18ppv02D9PIYlSksdo8bKmYBA+aE3EdC0TAan4/ONfbj9j0hi28xlxjds j6BQ9trkUt+cy7ThoKK8h3ohXB1n/VVv9G2JYAYyFi5uQF/VQFQn3oR8snD0+HjfjvO6 UmGO6UOqRsDodzoVFmnAQo251ZjWr7YEw2Arce44Q6VKVr4Et8k4tNWEwhJERk+H26RZ RceA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3t57AKeI1xYRZCiYXx8aixE72ubNyINyFMRSmh7qEavSziRDRJ AoYMZ2A9tKwcyGagZoQWySnwveaKMpU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdhBOLxt/Jae6mF4PWrUQzKRaSjSY/4VkNwLefMWIu/Ys1uNmfNuz61rfLiG/8PfNJ0lbMucw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:46d4:: with SMTP id j203-v6mr8508375itb.93.1530884997701; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.212] (107.191.0.158.static.utbb.net. [107.191.0.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o139-v6sm403845itc.21.2018.07.06.06.49.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Jul 2018 06:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] block, mm: remove unnecessary __GFP_HIGH flag To: Shakeel Butt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180703171446.220105-1-shakeelb@google.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <1c8e690d-c3ff-602f-9f26-0dc7f7e65284@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 07:49:55 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180703171446.220105-1-shakeelb@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/3/18 11:14 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote: > The flag GFP_ATOMIC already contains __GFP_HIGH. There is no need to > explicitly or __GFP_HIGH again. So, just remove unnecessary __GFP_HIGH. Applied, thanks. -- Jens Axboe