From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B10EC433F5 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 07:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239574AbiDIHQO (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 03:16:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229530AbiDIHQM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 03:16:12 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD95B860; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 00:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi100015.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Kb5sY0c6pzgYWT; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:12:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi100015.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:14:03 +0800 Received: from [10.174.176.73] (10.174.176.73) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:14:02 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC v2 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load To: Jens Axboe , , , CC: , , References: <20220408073916.1428590-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <98d3b9b9-1786-837c-d316-cc991305c8aa@kernel.dk> From: "yukuai (C)" Message-ID: <1c9b79e2-f44b-8e08-ee39-aa8eda3afc50@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:14:02 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98d3b9b9-1786-837c-d316-cc991305c8aa@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2022/04/09 10:28, Jens Axboe 写道: > On 4/8/22 8:26 PM, yukuai (C) wrote: >> 在 2022/04/09 3:10, Jens Axboe 写道: >>> For this one, and other patches you send, they send up in spam because >>> the sender can't be verified. I would encourage you to figure out what >>> is going wrong here, because a lot of your patches end up getting >>> dropped or missed because of it. >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your notice, however, I have no clue what is going on right >> now. I'll look for some help and hopefully that can be fixed. > > The easiest is probably to try and send patches to a gmail account. If > you don't have one, just create one. That will help you see the issue > and verify whatever the fix might be. It might be a company email > server issue, hower. > I tried to send a patch to gmail, however, no issues are found. I am contacting our IT support and hope they can figure out what is going on. By the way, I didn't see anything unusual for my patches in linux-block patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/list/?series=&submitter=187999&state=&q=&archive=both&delegate= Is there a seperate place to track patches? Thanks, Kuai