From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Hagar Hemdan <hagarhem@amazon.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
wuchi <wuchi.zero@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mohamed@amazon.com,
Abuelfotoh@amazon.com, Hazem <abuehaze@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: BUG Report: Fork benchmark drop by 30% on aarch64
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:38:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ca758c7-b6ab-4880-9cc7-217093a30bbb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207110754.GA10452@amazon.com>
On 07/02/2025 12:07, Hagar Hemdan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:14:54AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> Hi Hagar,
>>
>> On 05/02/2025 16:10, Hagar Hemdan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There is about a 30% drop in fork benchmark [1] on aarch64 and a 10%
>>> drop on x86_64 using kernel v6.13.1.
>>>
>>> Git bisect pointed to commit eff6c8ce8d4d ("sched/core: Reduce cost
>>> of sched_move_task when config autogroup") which merged starting
>>> v6.4-rc1.
>>>
>>> The regression only happens when number of CPUs is equal to number
>>> of threads [2] that fork test is creating which means it's only visible
>>> under CPU contention.
>>>
>>> I used m6g.xlarge AWS EC2 Instance with 4 vCPUs and 16 GiB RAM for ARM64
>>> and m6a.xlarge with also 4 vCPUs and 16 GiB RAM for x86_64.
>>>
>>> I noticed this regression exists only when autogroup config is enabled.
>>
>> So '# CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP is not set' in .config so we have:
>>
>> static inline void sched_autogroup_exit_task(struct task_struct *p) { }
>>
>> I.e. doing a 'echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled' still
>> shows this issue?
> yes, when I do 'echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled',
> It behaves like the disable 'CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP'.
OK.
>>> Run the fork test with these combinations and autogroup is enabled:
>>>
>>> Arch | commit eff6c8ce8d4d | Fork Result (lps) | %Cpu(s)
>>> ----------+---------------------+--------------------+------------------
>>> aarch64 | without | 28677.0 | 3.2 us, 96.7 sy
>>> aarch64 | with | 19860.7 (30% drop) | 2.7 us, 79.4 sy
>>> x86_64 | without | 27776.2 | 3.1 us, 96.9 sy
>>> x86_64 | with | 25020.6 (10% drop) | 4.1 us, 93.2 sy
>>> ----------+---------------------+--------------------+------------------
>>
>> Can you rerun with:
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 3e5a6bf587f9..62cc50c79a78 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -9057,7 +9057,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> * group changes.
>> */
>> group = sched_get_task_group(tsk);
>> - if (group == tsk->sched_task_group)
>> + if ((group == tsk->sched_task_group) && !(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING))
>> return;
> I tried that and I see it fixed the regression and the cpu utilization
> is 100% with it.
W/ this one, we force the 'spawn' tasks into:
sched_change_group() -> task_change_group_fair()
> I'd like to ask if this like reverting the patch in case of exit path
> and also means the enqueue/dequeue are needed in case of task exiting,
> right?
The 'spawn' tasks in sched_move_task() are 'running' and 'queued' so we
call dequeue_task(), put_prev_task(), enqueue_task() and
set_next_task().
I guess what we need here is the cfs_rq->avg.load_avg (cpu_load() in
case of root tg) update in:
task_change_group_fair() -> detach_task_cfs_rq() -> ...,
attach_task_cfs_rq() -> ...
since this is used for WF_FORK, WF_EXEC handling in wakeup:
select_task_rq_fair() -> sched_balance_find_dst_cpu() ->
sched_balance_find_dst_group_cpu()
in form of 'least_loaded_cpu' and 'load = cpu_load(cpu_rq(i)'.
You mentioned AutoGroups (AG). I don't see this issue on my Debian 12
Juno-r0 Arm64 board. When I run w/ AG, 'group' is '/' and
'tsk->sched_task_group' is '/autogroup-x' so the condition 'if (group ==
tsk->sched_task_group)' isn't true in sched_move_task(). If I disable AG
then they match "/" == "/".
I assume you run Ubuntu on your AWS instances? What kind of
'cgroup/taskgroup' related setup are you using?
Can you run w/ this debug snippet w/ and w/o AG enabled?
-->8--
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3e5a6bf587f9..c696740177b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -9035,6 +9035,8 @@ static void sched_change_group(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_group *group
set_task_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk));
}
+extern void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *path, int plen);
+
/*
* Change task's runqueue when it moves between groups.
*
@@ -9048,6 +9050,8 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK;
struct task_group *group;
struct rq *rq;
+ int cpu = cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(&tsk->se)));
+ char buf_1[64], buf_2[64];
CLASS(task_rq_lock, rq_guard)(tsk);
rq = rq_guard.rq;
@@ -9057,6 +9061,13 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
* group changes.
*/
group = sched_get_task_group(tsk);
+
+ task_group_path(group, buf_1, sizeof(buf_1));
+ task_group_path(tsk->sched_task_group, buf_2, sizeof(buf_2));
+
+ trace_printk("%s %d cpu=%d group=%s tsk->sched_task_group=%s\n",
+ tsk->comm, tsk->pid, cpu, buf_1, buf_2);
+
if (group == tsk->sched_task_group)
return;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index a1be00a988bf..c967d55f971f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -701,7 +701,9 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sched_debug_lock);
static char group_path[PATH_MAX];
-static void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *path, int plen)
+extern void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *path, int plen);
+
+void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *path, int plen)
{
if (autogroup_path(tg, path, plen))
return;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 26958431deb7..f90d28be9695 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -13198,9 +13198,16 @@ void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
#endif
}
+extern void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *path, int plen);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
static void task_change_group_fair(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ int cpu = cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(&p->se)));
+ struct task_group *tg = task_group(p);
+ unsigned long cfs_rq_load_avg_pre, cfs_rq_load_avg_post;
+ char buf[64];
+
/*
* We couldn't detach or attach a forked task which
* hasn't been woken up by wake_up_new_task().
@@ -13208,14 +13215,33 @@ static void task_change_group_fair(struct task_struct *p)
if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_NEW)
return;
+ task_group_path(tg, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ cfs_rq_load_avg_pre = cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->avg.load_avg;
+
detach_task_cfs_rq(p);
+ cfs_rq_load_avg_post = cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->avg.load_avg;
+
+ trace_printk("%s %d (d) cpu=%d tg=%s load_avg=%lu->%lu\n",
+ p->comm, p->pid, cpu, buf, cfs_rq_load_avg_pre,
+ cfs_rq_load_avg_post);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* Tell se's cfs_rq has been changed -- migrated */
p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
#endif
set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
+
+ task_group_path(tg, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ cfs_rq_load_avg_pre = cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->avg.load_avg;
+
attach_task_cfs_rq(p);
+
+ cfs_rq_load_avg_post = cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->avg.load_avg;
+
+ trace_printk("%s %d (a) cpu=%d tg=%s load_avg=%lu->%lu\n",
+ p->comm, p->pid, cpu, buf, cfs_rq_load_avg_pre,
+ cfs_rq_load_avg_post);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 15:10 Hagar Hemdan
2025-02-07 9:14 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-02-07 11:07 ` Hagar Hemdan
2025-02-10 10:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2025-02-10 21:31 ` Hagar Hemdan
2025-02-11 16:27 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-02-11 21:40 ` Hagar Hemdan
2025-02-13 18:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-02-17 22:51 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-02-21 6:44 ` Hagar Hemdan
2025-03-03 10:05 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-03-03 13:57 ` Hagar Hemdan
2025-02-28 19:39 ` Hagar Hemdan
2025-03-03 10:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ca758c7-b6ab-4880-9cc7-217093a30bbb@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Abuelfotoh@amazon.com \
--cc=Mohamed@amazon.com \
--cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
--cc=hagarhem@amazon.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wuchi.zero@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®