From: Aditya <yashsri421@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: fix false positive for COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE with URLs
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:05:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ce4502a-d75a-7e27-5844-f195607c4c99@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94d6a56174c56ef13c9794186fdbfcc12c376c00.camel@perches.com>
On 17/12/20 10:33 pm, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 19:12 +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>> Currently checkpatch warns for long line in commit messages even for
>> URL lines.
>>
>> An evaluation over v4.13..v5.8 showed that out of ~11000 warnings for
>> this class, around 790 are due to the line containing link.
>>
>> E.g. running checkpatch on commit 3cde818cd02b ("ASoC: topology:
>> Consolidate how dtexts and dvalues are freed") reports this warning:
>>
>> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
>> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-January/144761.html
>>
>> Avoid giving users warning for character limit, instead suggest them to
>> prefix the URLs with "Link:"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
>> @@ -3032,8 +3032,14 @@ sub process {
>> $line =~ /^\s*(?:Fixes:|Link:|$signature_tags)/i ||
>> # A Fixes: or Link: line or signature tag line
>> $commit_log_possible_stack_dump)) {
>> - WARN("COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE",
>> - "Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)\n" . $herecurr);
>> + if ($line =~ /(?:http|https|ftp):\/\//) {
>> + WARN("COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE",
>> + "Consider prefixing the URL with 'Link:'\n" . $herecurr);
>> + }
>> + else {
>> + WARN("COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE",
>> + "Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)\n" . $herecurr);
>> + }
>
> NAK.
>
> Aditya, you've submitted several patches to checkpatch and
> you should know better by now what coding style is necessary
> for acceptance.
>
> } else {
>
Sorry, I missed it. Will change it :)
> Make the URI/URL check follow the styles allowed by RFC 3986.
> Look at the long_line check around line 3500 introduced by
> commit 2e4bbbc550be336cbb3defc67430fc0700aa1426
> Author: Andreas Brauchli <a.brauchli@elementarea.net>
> Date: Tue Feb 6 15:38:45 2018 -0800
> checkpatch: allow long lines containing URL
>
> Also likely the URI should not be allowed to exceed the line
> maximum unless it's the first non-whitespace of the line and
> not starting after some other word in the line.
>
> Lastly, this sets $commit_log_long_line even for lines that
> are now nominally exempted from the long line check.
>
Okay. I'll make these changes and send the modified patch.
> The number of nominal fixes you showed above is not correct.
>
> Retrospective testing of checkpatch using --git history
> should be aware of changes to checkpatch.
>
> This should count only lines from 75 to 80 chars for the
> commit range you tested and only for 75 to 100 for commits
> after checkpatch changed its allowed long line maximum in
> commit bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144
> checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning
>
Joe, I think this is probably true only for "WARNING:LONG_LINE".
However, here I have analyzed the count for
"WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE".
I ran git log on these lines. Probably these lines were last changed
at 2a076f40d8c9be95bee7bcf18436655e1140447f.
I think I can change the count with exact numbers.
What do you think?
Thanks
Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-17 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 13:42 Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-17 17:03 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-17 19:35 ` Aditya [this message]
2020-12-18 12:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Aditya Srivastava
2020-12-24 15:19 ` Aditya
2021-01-14 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] checkpatch: fix false positive for COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE and provide fix Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-14 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] checkpatch: fix false positive for COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE with URLs Aditya Srivastava
2021-01-14 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] checkpatch: add fix option " Aditya Srivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ce4502a-d75a-7e27-5844-f195607c4c99@gmail.com \
--to=yashsri421@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®