From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>,
hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-coherent: Add one parameter to save available coherent memory
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 18:25:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d02b2e1-dd1c-af2a-e980-29aef4aa0c00@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5765cf69bf222757463ba2653ac760b42b785e6.1527745258.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
On 31/05/18 06:55, Baolin Wang wrote:
> It is incorrect to use mem->size to valid if there are enough coherent
> memory to allocate in __dma_alloc_from_coherent(), since some devices
> may mark some occupied coherent memory by dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied().
>
> So we can introduce one 'avail' parameter to save the available device
> coherent memory, to valid if we have enough coherent memory for the device
> to allocate.
We already have dma_mem->size stored for other reasons, so there's
little harm in using it for a rough sanity check to short-circuit the
odd allocation which cannot possibly succeed, but adding machinery
purely for the sake an ever-so-slightly more accurate, but still far
from exhaustive, check doesn't really seem worth it.
Even if size <= dma_mem->avail there's still no guarantee that the
allocation will actually succeed, so what benefit does the explicit
accounting provide?
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-coherent.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> index 597d408..ce19832 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct dma_coherent_mem {
> unsigned long *bitmap;
> spinlock_t spinlock;
> bool use_dev_dma_pfn_offset;
> + int avail;
> };
>
> static struct dma_coherent_mem *dma_coherent_default_memory __ro_after_init;
> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static int dma_init_coherent_memory(
> dma_mem->device_base = device_addr;
> dma_mem->pfn_base = PFN_DOWN(phys_addr);
> dma_mem->size = pages;
> + dma_mem->avail = pages;
> dma_mem->flags = flags;
> spin_lock_init(&dma_mem->spinlock);
>
> @@ -141,6 +143,7 @@ void *dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied(struct device *dev,
> dma_addr_t device_addr, size_t size)
> {
> struct dma_coherent_mem *mem = dev->dma_mem;
> + int order = get_order(size);
> unsigned long flags;
> int pos, err;
>
> @@ -151,7 +154,9 @@ void *dma_mark_declared_memory_occupied(struct device *dev,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->spinlock, flags);
> pos = PFN_DOWN(device_addr - dma_get_device_base(dev, mem));
> - err = bitmap_allocate_region(mem->bitmap, pos, get_order(size));
> + err = bitmap_allocate_region(mem->bitmap, pos, order);
> + if (!err)
> + mem->avail -= 1 << order;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>
> if (err != 0)
> @@ -170,7 +175,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_from_coherent(struct dma_coherent_mem *mem,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->spinlock, flags);
>
> - if (unlikely(size > (mem->size << PAGE_SHIFT)))
> + if (unlikely(size > (mem->avail << PAGE_SHIFT)))
> goto err;
>
> pageno = bitmap_find_free_region(mem->bitmap, mem->size, order);
> @@ -182,6 +187,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_from_coherent(struct dma_coherent_mem *mem,
> */
> *dma_handle = mem->device_base + (pageno << PAGE_SHIFT);
> ret = mem->virt_base + (pageno << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + mem->avail -= 1 << order;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
> memset(ret, 0, size);
> return ret;
> @@ -244,6 +250,7 @@ static int __dma_release_from_coherent(struct dma_coherent_mem *mem,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->spinlock, flags);
> bitmap_release_region(mem->bitmap, page, order);
> + mem->avail += 1 << order;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mem->spinlock, flags);
> return 1;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-31 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-31 5:55 Baolin Wang
2018-05-31 5:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-coherent: Change the bitmap APIs Baolin Wang
2018-05-31 17:38 ` Robin Murphy
2018-06-03 2:11 ` Baolin Wang
2018-05-31 17:25 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-06-03 2:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-coherent: Add one parameter to save available coherent memory Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d02b2e1-dd1c-af2a-e980-29aef4aa0c00@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®