From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Aleksa Savic <savicaleksa83@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, leonard.anderweit@gmail.com,
Jack Doan <me@jackdoan.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (aquacomputer_d5next) Add support for temperature sensor offsets
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 07:21:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d052998-9ac2-2d4b-927a-06e0318eaef4@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ef88c2c-3435-8847-0f4f-53e81cd3af5d@gmail.com>
On 10/23/22 06:15, Aleksa Savic wrote:
> On 2022-10-22 15:57:20 GMT+02:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Please go up to 100 columns to avoid excessive line splits.
>
> Will fix this and other comments in v2.
>
>> Is it really necessary to re-read the control buffer repeatedly
>> to report this value ? I don't know how costly that is, but unlike
>> the pwm value I would not expect the number to change.
>
> Yes, aside from the driver userspace can also change settings on the
> device using hidraw and we'd end up with stale data. Reading it is
> very fast, it takes about 4ms in my testing.
>
>> Also, is this number indeed not included in the regular reports
>> sent from the controller ?
>
> Unfortunately, it's not. The sensor report only includes final (calculated)
> sensor readings.
>
>> The driver doesn't distinguish between offsets in the control buffer
>> (pwm, and now temperature sensor offset) and offsets in the report buffer,
>> making it a bit difficult to determine if those are the same or not.
>> Some explanation in the driver would be nice if someone finds the time
>> to provide one. If the control buffer offsets are in a different number
>> space, they should really be marked accordingly (for example with a
>> _CTRL in the define).
>
> I can see how it can be confusing. After this, I can send a patch to
> reorder the macros & initializations and add more comments regarding
> what is what.
>
Please do.
Thanks,
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-23 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 17:48 Aleksa Savic
2022-10-22 13:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-23 13:15 ` Aleksa Savic
2022-10-23 14:21 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d052998-9ac2-2d4b-927a-06e0318eaef4@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=leonard.anderweit@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@jackdoan.com \
--cc=savicaleksa83@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®