From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuwamy@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] x86/split_lock: Fix the split lock #AC handling when running as guest
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:30:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d3c97cd-d243-6a2c-9964-4d1d22691db0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWhG+UcaRyNptzw9@google.com>
On 10/14/2021 11:04 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> On 10/14/2021 5:32 AM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
>>> + Xiaoyao
>>>
>>> On 10/13/21 1:30 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>>>> From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> If running as guest and hypervisor enables
>>>>> MSR_TEST_CTRL.SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT during its running, it can get split
>>>>> lock #AC even though sld_state is sld_off.
>>>> That's a hypervisor bug, no? The hypervisor should never inject a fault
>>>> that the guest cannot reasonably expect.
>>
>> What if hypervisor doesn't intercept #AC and host enables SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT
>> during guest running? That's exactly the case TDX is facing.
>
> That's a hypervisor bug. Since it sounds like the TDX Module buries its head in
> the sand for split-lock #AC, KVM should refuse to run TDX guests if split-lock #AC
> is enabled. Ideally the TDX Module would provide support for conditionally
> intercepting #AC, e.g. intercept and re-inject "normal" #AC, and exit to the VMM
> for split-lock #AC. That would give VMMs the option of enabling split-lock
> detection in fatal mode for guests.
>
We have bus lock VM exit for it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 23:05 [PATCH v7 0/6] Add TDX Guest Support (boot support) Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] x86/boot: Add a trampoline for APs booting in 64-bit mode Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] x86/boot: Avoid #VE during boot for TDX platforms Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-17 19:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] x86/topology: Disable CPU online/offline control for TDX guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-17 19:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-17 19:28 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] x86/tdx: Forcefully disable legacy PIC for TDX guests Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] x86: Skip WBINVD instruction for VM guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-05 23:05 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] x86/split_lock: Fix the split lock #AC handling when running as guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-13 20:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-13 21:32 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-14 1:24 ` Xiaoyao Li
2021-10-14 2:21 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-14 15:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-15 1:30 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2021-10-06 8:21 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] Add TDX Guest Support (boot support) David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d3c97cd-d243-6a2c-9964-4d1d22691db0@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=knsathya@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuwamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome