mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix.com>,
	John Linn <John.Linn@xilinx.com>,
	David DeBonis <david.debonis@xilinx.com>
Cc: microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Rethinking MicroBlaze commandline precedence
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:28:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d3f23370908092328l6e980f3ft2d5a8f8f37c26fcf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

Currently, MicroBlaze commandline handling in order of lowest to
highest priority, looks like this:

1. pointer in r5 from bootloader
2. CONFIG_CMDLINE=...
3. "chosen" section in DTS/DT
4. CONFIG_CMDLINE=... && CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE

I'm wondering if a cmdline in r5 should override the DTS.  My thinking
is based on two observations:

(a) not everyone will use a bootloader like u-boot that can manipulate
DTBs easily before kernel boot
(b) a custom cmdline string in r5 allows the latest possible binding
(runtime), where as the DTB is typically created at compile time.

So, how about this order instead:

1. CONFIG_CMDLINE=...
2. "chosen" section in DTS/DT
3. pointer in r5 from bootloader
4. CONFIG_CMDLINE=... and CONFIG_CMDLINE_FORCE

Then, apart from CMDLINE_FORCE, the precedence goes from earliest
binding (kernel build) to latest (runtime via bootloader/r5).

Thoughts?

John
-- 
John Williams, PhD, B.Eng, B.IT
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com  p: +61-7-30090663  f: +61-7-30090663

             reply	other threads:[~2009-08-10  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-10  6:28 John Williams [this message]
2009-08-10  7:29 ` [microblaze-uclinux] " Michal Simek
2009-08-10  8:56   ` John Williams
2009-08-10  9:25     ` Michal Simek
2009-08-10 16:42       ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2009-08-11  7:06         ` Michal Simek
2009-08-11 16:18           ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2009-08-11 16:59             ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d3f23370908092328l6e980f3ft2d5a8f8f37c26fcf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=john.williams@petalogix.com \
    --cc=John.Linn@xilinx.com \
    --cc=david.debonis@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®