From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix retry logic in f2fs_write_cache_pages()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 10:45:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d54379e-35c7-76e0-0c8a-d89bfcecb935@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1590546056-17871-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
On 2020/5/27 10:20, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> In case a compressed file is getting overwritten, the current retry
> logic doesn't include the current page to be retried now as it sets
> the new start index as 0 and new end index as writeback_index - 1.
> This causes the corresponding cluster to be uncompressed and written
> as normal pages without compression. Fix this by allowing writeback to
> be retried for the current page as well (in case of compressed page
> getting retried due to index mismatch with cluster index). So that
> this cluster can be written compressed in case of overwrite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 4af5fcd..bfd1df4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -3024,7 +3024,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> if ((!cycled && !done) || retry) {
IMO, we add retry logic in wrong place, you can see that cycled value is
zero only if wbc->range_cyclic is true, in that case writeback_index is valid.
However if retry is true and wbc->range_cyclic is false, then writeback_index
would be uninitialized variable.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
> cycled = 1;
> index = 0;
> - end = writeback_index - 1;
> + end = retry ? -1 : writeback_index - 1;
> goto retry;
> }
> if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && wbc->nr_to_write > 0))
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 2:20 Sahitya Tummala
2020-05-28 2:45 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2020-05-28 2:55 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-05-28 19:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-06-01 9:15 ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-06-01 9:20 ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-06-01 11:43 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d54379e-35c7-76e0-0c8a-d89bfcecb935@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®