From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrei-Edward Popa <andrei.popa105@yahoo.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-remap: fix dma_common_find_pages() page lookup for offsets
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:31:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d552f40-74b3-4c6d-874d-508ecb0e75d2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c71603c6-fa05-4cd6-836a-4bbf55ba5ca9@samsung.com>
On 2025-12-15 8:13 am, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 15.12.2025 06:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:09:14PM +0200, Andrei-Edward Popa wrote:
>>> dma_common_find_pages() previously assumed that the CPU virtual address
>>> always pointed to the start of a DMA-coherent allocation. This fails when
>>> memory is allocated via dma_alloc_attrs() without DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS
>>> and then subdivided into smaller blocks using a gen_pool, relevant only
>>> when an IOMMU is enabled.
>>>
>>> In such cases, userspace may request a mapping via dma_mmap_attrs()
>>> for a CPU address that is offset inside the original allocation. The
>>> previous code could return the wrong struct page pointer.
>> No, you can't mmap part of a dma coherent allocation. What caller is
>> trying to do this? It needs to be fixed instead.
>
> I wonder if this was ever explicitly stated.
Seems it never made it into the text documentation, but it is stated in
the kerneldoc.
> dma_mmap_coherent() was initially added for mmapeing a
> dma_alloc_coherent()-allocated buffer for fbdev and alsa, and at least
> the first one allowed to mmap the buffer partially or starting at
> non-zero offset. I doubt that this feature was useful for anything, but
> I'm quite sure this was at least allowed and there were some comments in
> the code about that.
Mapping part of a buffer in general is fine, provided the fd advertised
to userspace represents the entire buffer - then the offset/size of the
VMA determine how much of it actually gets mapped. What you can't do is
advertise parts of a buffer *as separate fds* and then expect to pass
mmap calls on those straight through, without adjusting them to be
relative to the whole buffer.
We don't provide such a generic helper for mmap'ing from a generic
dma_pool, largely because the main point of those is for drivers that
want to allocate lots of buffers smaller than PAGE_SIZE, such that
trying to mmap them to userspace would most likely be a giant security
hole anyway.
Thanks,
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20251212200914.138310-1-andrei.popa105.ref@yahoo.com>
2025-12-12 20:09 ` Andrei-Edward Popa
2025-12-15 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-15 8:13 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-12-15 11:31 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-12-15 20:49 ` Andrei-Edward Popa
2025-12-15 10:52 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d552f40-74b3-4c6d-874d-508ecb0e75d2@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=andrei.popa105@yahoo.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®