From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 4/4] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:31:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d56b889-0730-41cc-ac41-976f9ba543c5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019070836.2972403-5-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Sashiko raises new comments about this patch,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-176751@kernel.org/
It looks we need a new version to address the comments. Thanks.
On 10/19/2026 3:08 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> The branch snapshot callback used by bpf_get_branch_snapshot() always
> copies x86_pmu.lbr_nr entries from cpuc->lbr_entries[], even when the
> last LBR read kept fewer branches. The entries past lbr_stack.nr hold
> invalid branches which end up reaching BPF programs.
>
> Limit copying to lbr_stack.nr entries and also reset lbr_stack.nr when
> no active LBR events or LBR hardware is owned by guest. So the stale or
> guest LBR stack data can't be leaked.
>
> When all active LBR users are PEBS events, the LBR stack is already
> updated from the PEBS records, so there is no need to read the LBR
> hardware again.
>
> Fixes: c22ac2a3d4bd ("perf: Enable branch record for software events")
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-163130@kernel.org/
> Co-developed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 9 +++++++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 0a34d674df59..5dfb9e9156e8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ __intel_pmu_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries,
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>
> intel_pmu_lbr_read();
> - cnt = min_t(unsigned int, cnt, x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
> + cnt = min_t(unsigned int, cnt, cpuc->lbr_stack.nr);
>
> memcpy(entries, cpuc->lbr_entries, sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry) * cnt);
> intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> index 249db12e927e..cc0300aba7de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> @@ -1022,14 +1022,19 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>
> + if (!cpuc->lbr_users || vlbr_exclude_host()) {
> + /* Reset lbr_stack.nr to prevent stale data leakage. */
> + cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Don't read when all LBRs users are using adaptive PEBS.
> *
> * This could be smarter and actually check the event,
> * but this simple approach seems to work for now.
> */
> - if (!cpuc->lbr_users || vlbr_exclude_host() ||
> - cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users)
> + if (cpuc->lbr_users == cpuc->lbr_pebs_users)
> return;
>
> x86_pmu.lbr_read(cpuc);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 7:08 [Patch v3 0/4] perf/x86: " Dapeng Mi
2026-10-19 7:08 ` [Patch v3 1/4] perf/x86: Clamp x86_pmu.lbr_nr to MAX_LBR_ENTRIES Dapeng Mi
2026-10-19 7:08 ` [Patch v3 2/4] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Dapeng Mi
2026-10-19 7:08 ` [Patch v3 3/4] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Reset the cached LBR stack in intel_pmu_lbr_reset() Dapeng Mi
2026-10-19 7:08 ` [Patch v3 4/4] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Dapeng Mi
2026-10-19 9:31 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d56b889-0730-41cc-ac41-976f9ba543c5@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®