From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@linux.dev>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:04:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d5abb48-08a8-4d83-a681-6915bc7b6907@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FCDCBCEE-7D97-4769-AB95-7294A9CE18E0@linux.dev>
On 09/04/2024 01:10, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
>> On Apr 8, 2024, at 16:30, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 06/04/2024 11:31, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 09:32:34AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>> Hi Itaru,
>>>>
>>>> On 05/04/2024 08:39, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:04PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It turns out that creating the linear map can take a significant proportion of
>>>>>> the total boot time, especially when rodata=full. And most of the time is spent
>>>>>> waiting on superfluous tlb invalidation and memory barriers. This series reworks
>>>>>> the kernel pgtable generation code to significantly reduce the number of those
>>>>>> TLBIs, ISBs and DSBs. See each patch for details.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The below shows the execution time of map_mem() across a couple of different
>>>>>> systems with different RAM configurations. We measure after applying each patch
>>>>>> and show the improvement relative to base (v6.9-rc2):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra
>>>>>> | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G
>>>>>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>>>>>> | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%)
>>>>>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>>>>>> base | 153 (0%) | 2227 (0%) | 8798 (0%) | 17442 (0%)
>>>>>> no-cont-remap | 77 (-49%) | 431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%)
>>>>>> batch-barriers | 13 (-92%) | 162 (-93%) | 655 (-93%) | 1656 (-91%)
>>>>>> no-alloc-remap | 11 (-93%) | 109 (-95%) | 449 (-95%) | 1257 (-93%)
>>>>>> lazy-unmap | 6 (-96%) | 61 (-97%) | 257 (-97%) | 838 (-95%)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series applies on top of v6.9-rc2. All mm selftests pass. I've compile and
>>>>>> boot tested various PAGE_SIZE and VA size configs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since v1 [1]
>>>>>> ====================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Added Tested-by tags (thanks to Eric and Itaru)
>>>>>> - Renamed ___set_pte() -> __set_pte_nosync() (per Ard)
>>>>>> - Reordered patches (biggest impact & least controversial first)
>>>>>> - Reordered alloc/map/unmap functions in mmu.c to aid reader
>>>>>> - pte_clear() -> __pte_clear() in clear_fixmap_nosync()
>>>>>> - Reverted generic p4d_index() which caused x86 build error. Replaced with
>>>>>> unconditional p4d_index() define under arm64.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240326101448.3453626-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/ <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240326101448.3453626-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ryan Roberts (4):
>>>>>> arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd) block
>>>>>> arm64: mm: Batch dsb and isb when populating pgtables
>>>>>> arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables for allocate vs populate
>>>>>> arm64: mm: Lazily clear pte table mappings from fixmap
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/fixmap.h | 5 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 8 +
>>>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 13 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 10 +-
>>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/fixmap.c | 11 +
>>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 377 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>>> 6 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've build and boot tested the v2 on FVP, base is taken from your
>>>>> linux-rr repo. Running run_vmtests.sh on v2 left some gup longterm not oks, would you take a look at it? The mm ksefltests used is from your linux-rr repo too.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for taking a look at this.
>>>>
>>>> I can't reproduce your issue unfortunately; steps as follows on Apple M2 VM:
>>>>
>>>> Config: arm64 defconfig + the following:
>>>>
>>>> # Squashfs for snaps, xfs for large file folios.
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_LZ4
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_LZO
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_XZ
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_SQUASHFS_ZSTD
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_XFS_FS
>>>>
>>>> # For general mm debug.
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
>>>>
>>>> # For mm selftests.
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_USERFAULTFD
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC
>>>> ./scripts/config --enable CONFIG_GUP_TEST
>>>>
>>>> Running on VM with 12G memory, split across 2 (emulated) NUMA nodes (needed by
>>>> some mm selftests), with kernel command line to reserve hugetlbs and other
>>>> features required by some mm selftests:
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>> transparent_hugepage=madvise earlycon root=/dev/vda2 secretmem.enable
>>>> hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:2,1:2 hugepagesz=32M hugepages=0:2,1:2
>>>> default_hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:64,1:64 hugepagesz=64K hugepages=0:2,1:2
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> Ubuntu userspace running off XFS rootfs. Build and run mm selftests from same
>>>> git tree.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Although I don't think any of this config should make a difference to gup_longterm.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like your errors are all "ftruncate() failed". I've seen this problem on
>>>> our CI system. There it is due to running the tests from NFS file system. What
>>>> filesystem are you using? Perhaps you are sharing into the FVP using 9p? That
>>>> might also be problematic.
>>>
>>> That was it. This time I booted up the kernel including your series on
>>> QEMU on my M1 and executed the gup_longterm program without the ftruncate
>>> failures. When testing your kernel on FVP, I was executing the script from the FVP's host filesystem using 9p.
>>
>> I'm not sure exactly what the root cause is. Perhaps there isn't enough space on
>> the disk? It might be worth enhancing the error log to provide the errno in
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/gup_longterm.c.
>>
>
> Attached is the strace’d gup_longterm executiong log on your
> pgtable-boot-speedup-v2 kernel.
Sorry are you saying that it only fails with the pgtable-boot-speedup-v2 patch
set applied? I thought we previously concluded that it was independent of that?
I was under the impression that it was filesystem related and not something that
I was planning to investigate.
>
> Thanks,
> Itaru.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Itaru.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does this problem reproduce with v6.9-rc2, without my patches? I except it
>>>> probably does?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Itaru.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 14:33 Ryan Roberts
2024-04-04 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd) block Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10 9:46 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-10 10:27 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-04 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: mm: Batch dsb and isb when populating pgtables Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10 10:06 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-10 10:25 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-10 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-04 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables for allocate vs populate Ryan Roberts
2024-04-11 13:02 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-11 13:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-11 14:48 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-11 14:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-11 15:25 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-11 15:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-12 7:53 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-12 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-04 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: mm: Lazily clear pte table mappings from fixmap Ryan Roberts
2024-04-11 13:24 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-11 13:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-05 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Speed up boot with faster linear map creation Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-06 8:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-06 10:31 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-08 7:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-09 0:10 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-09 10:04 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-04-09 10:13 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-09 11:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 11:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 11:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 14:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-09 14:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 14:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-09 14:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-09 23:30 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-10 6:47 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-10 7:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-10 7:37 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-10 7:45 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d5abb48-08a8-4d83-a681-6915bc7b6907@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=echanude@redhat.com \
--cc=itaru.kitayama@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®