From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow AVIC's IPI virtualization to be optional
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:14:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d6044e0d71cd95c477e319d7e47819eee61a8fc.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZRsYNnYEEaY1gMo5@google.com>
У пн, 2023-10-02 у 12:21 -0700, Sean Christopherson пише:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This patch allows AVIC's ICR emulation to be optional and thus allows
> > to workaround AVIC's errata #1235 by disabling this portion of the feature.
> >
> > This is v3 of my patch series 'AVIC bugfixes and workarounds' including
> > review feedback.
>
> Please respond to my idea[*] instead of sending more patches.
Hi,
For the v2 of the patch I was already on the fence if to do it this way or to refactor
the code, and back when I posted it, I decided still to avoid the refactoring.
However, your idea of rewriting this patch, while it does change less lines of code,
is even less obvious and consequently required you to write even longer comment to
justify it which is not a good sign.
In particular I don't want someone to find out later, and in the hard way that sometimes
real physid table is accessed, and sometimes a fake copy of it is.
So I decided to fix the root cause by not reading the physid table back,
which made the code cleaner, and even with the workaround the code
IMHO is still simpler than it was before.
About the added 'vcpu->loaded' variable, I added it also because it is something that is
long overdue to be added, I remember that in IPIv code there was also a need for this,
and probalby more places in KVM can be refactored to take advantage of it,
instead of various hacks.
I did adopt your idea of using 'enable_ipiv', although I am still not 100% sure that this
is more readable than 'avic_zen2_workaround'.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
> I'm not opposed to
> a different approach, but we need to have an actual discussion around the pros and
> cons, and hopefully come to an agreement. This cover letter doesn't even acknowledge
> that there is an alternative proposal, let alone justify why the vcpu->loaded
> approach was taken.
>
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZRYxPNeq1rnp-M0f@google.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-02 11:57 Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: Add per vCPU flag specifying that a vCPU is loaded Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86: KVM: AVIC: stop using 'is_running' bit in avic_vcpu_put() Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86: KVM: don't read physical ID table entry in avic_pi_update_irte() Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86: KVM: SVM: allow optionally to disable AVIC's IPI virtualization Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow AVIC's IPI virtualization to be optional Sean Christopherson
2023-10-04 13:14 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2024-09-10 20:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-09-23 9:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-23 16:23 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-10-22 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-22 19:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-22 3:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-11-26 0:25 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d6044e0d71cd95c477e319d7e47819eee61a8fc.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®