From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0083D17BC9; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720059523; cv=none; b=gAWF4Tp1l5JhGvt4TlVZDn2YfFAKVGcCBsanZ08ReAtvpofAUjBg5qjjxQhJ4rHa5txS+i2K0pDifqJc29zfayF3uJb9khSZjnZvftqS+PvVAoKUbAulWVo0IQXoFrHx+0xOLARl/RPGm/4pMYJqyaCGhSJFrqLWcH8UU3du5qI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720059523; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Kvg4uFFS+cAF10ezRPJVO6ka+cVbzGF66bEBj7SFleQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=OHh4vXsDgF+fOAp4wnQQ4GoB5BarzTizAemxImS73Vz9u/dI+EeIU6/Y4qZ+ko8OYZv94ZF+1zaP+gVQWbbfA8dfPvyEwl81pjweeea5HUXp8eL6img3lxl/2p0EXwz2u5mKOv9Yv4J25wS9ZFzoihfRbYUjZV/hUF0XZwe6+Ug= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=x+5GUD8q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="x+5GUD8q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=94REdKfYR7keuLl0NvxhS+99V2sHMpOB+7xBvMYVslo=; b=x+5GUD8qyxaMpRyngAU0uPUxTJ TozvgJh1Dm/co3t7c5K8Jl5rhhprfx7fRsmvLJpgdAjvDw++b+7cvaAUo09C3cWS7/DT/IsuiaJ0I 6Ygmi1jZcPHEO3i30B3+j/J8I5rvMv2YOFulDELzCaN+dOYLX5CSS4XmSctxhq4Yitraf3wmnF4V5 Lw2gvgRZKiJLAQ+H4rnSY1ylbpmbgPZzkW9pEA4soqOnT6M5M0g8wrD2GzqTX/2EPVkfM892+C/CA J73bwMW/TtdzvV5m0D2303E639GLnZBK44lpfJXkd3hts5DXjSFsVtGSKVLj0qMl35M4x5flb1jXq q2y2XT6A==; Received: from [50.53.4.147] (helo=[192.168.254.15]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sPC3P-0000000BvQt-1W1H; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 02:18:35 +0000 Message-ID: <1d805df8-748a-4bbc-a3d9-d6aa01a0b16e@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:18:32 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Docs/mm/index: move allocation profiling document to unsorted documents chapter To: Suren Baghdasaryan , SeongJae Park Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet References: <87msmyt8zh.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20240703230040.90283-1-sj@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 7/3/24 7:10 PM, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:00 PM SeongJae Park wrote: >> >> On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:18:42 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> >>> SeongJae Park writes: >>> >>>> The memory allocation profiling document was added to the bottom of the >>>> new outline. Apparently it was not decided by well-defined guidelines >>>> or a thorough discussions. Rather than that, it was added there just >>>> because there was no place for such unsorted documents. Now there is >>>> the chapter. Move the document to the new place. >>> >>> I'll take this for now, but it's truly sad to see new documentation >>> being added to the slushpile at the end. It seems better to create a >>> "development tools" section in the new outline and put the allocation >>> profiling document there? >> >> I have no strong opinions about that. Cc-ing Suren and Kent, as they are the >> author of the allocation profiling document and hence might have some opinion. > > IMHO if this would be the only document belonging to "development > tools" then keeping it under unsorted is fine. > If more documents will fall into that category then Jonathan's > suggestion makes sense to me. Looking at the current list, page_owner > and maybe damon might be considered for this category as well. > SeongJae, WDYT? > Thanks, > Suren. > Documentation/dev-tools/ already contains 20 files. Unless you want to keep it under Documentation/mm/, that is. -- ~Randy