From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75245EECC for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 02:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706495087; cv=none; b=jPNo8CThrMCvYg464u/XRitZMVFlNdQVhJe84hF+PqQcMh3nezqpHhRXAt2wfX09GpEhOQwkVOCKOFQLBNc6CUcZV5FRiZS0jRdasZ48O4XDeAYBA/tklP16+eGHEO7hKSmbW5i1QJKVeY4UtI0n6ZyxcMgEjZuU1keKnmGCUB4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706495087; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QM0Apf5YM/YhV2MIMFE6WuZ8GatbXGGqiCs5MMKo5/E=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fRKOMdjNkd9dct4a5jd6b9KGeUVDFwBlkPo+pZ2Sy22Y8TwEG/8UvZ+RumnYSsOKS51rGUkvlVAylyEpIXsvkBzseJKP0Sc4UwW5Z056z/DDX8mgNQ2Cy5Xif9Or2lJ016P7o1b6/WrhJshUY7cmF3s7TEX7OuhLuaHO3wzq6IE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cqZZocFj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cqZZocFj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0174FC433C7; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 02:24:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706495086; bh=QM0Apf5YM/YhV2MIMFE6WuZ8GatbXGGqiCs5MMKo5/E=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=cqZZocFjY2MUmwZm6fI1QIsoKiI8+JNYh78Oz9XteTp9GFejix6cMn8cMmDYZsPrI 1w+5Q7wOiP0Oz4IIgL69EDooU3XocX6a6gPvGYMTaETCOr+xH2SxAZfba+6tU+V/VS ziWlKTItg2sVxrSIZoagVltnzwZV2h7yS2cuDj1EckYHjAJXdqv/nXbCzdQBpNAbGV 20V19/h0Oi6iQIvjOMDN4O6APWgvPoqXMKITkUj+41JifFfd7m8601g3kYuoIxv88p 1l4LD7V4HA0pVRs2r4zuXXqrJcj1tec538pmBjCX9m/1/th8LbqmYTlS6FtNGV7wja Jy22ky5cx9zNA== Message-ID: <1d80ae9f-7252-4262-9216-4e25742b1f63@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:24:41 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr Content-Language: en-US To: Zhiguo Niu , jaegeuk@kernel.org Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, niuzhiguo84@gmail.com, ke.wang@unisoc.com, hongyu.jin@unisoc.com References: <1706011734-1617-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: <1706011734-1617-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/1/23 20:08, Zhiguo Niu wrote: > There are some cases of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr not handled as > ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR,so unify the error handling about all of > f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr. > > Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks,