Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] overflow: Add struct_size_t() helper

[Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>]

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 20:53:54 -0700

> On Mon, 22 May 2023 14:18:13 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h
>> index 37eadb3d27a8..41acfe26df1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h
>> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct ice_buf_hdr {
>>  
>>  #define ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(hd_sz, ent_sz)                                 \
>>  	((ICE_PKG_BUF_SIZE -                                                  \
>> -	  struct_size((struct ice_buf_hdr *)0, section_entry, 1) - (hd_sz)) / \
>> +	  struct_size_t(struct ice_buf_hdr,  section_entry, 1) - (hd_sz)) / \
>>  	 (ent_sz))
>>  
>>  /* ice package section IDs */
>> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct ice_label_section {
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define ICE_MAX_LABELS_IN_BUF                                             \
>> -	ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size((struct ice_label_section *)0, \
>> +	ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size_t(struct ice_label_section,  \
>>  					   label, 1) -                    \
>>  				       sizeof(struct ice_label),          \
>>  			       sizeof(struct ice_label))
>> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct ice_boost_tcam_section {
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define ICE_MAX_BST_TCAMS_IN_BUF                                               \
>> -	ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size((struct ice_boost_tcam_section *)0, \
>> +	ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size_t(struct ice_boost_tcam_section,  \
>>  					   tcam, 1) -                          \
>>  				       sizeof(struct ice_boost_tcam_entry),    \
>>  			       sizeof(struct ice_boost_tcam_entry))
>> @@ -372,8 +372,7 @@ struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_section {
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define ICE_MAX_MARKER_PTYPE_TCAMS_IN_BUF                                    \
>> -	ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(                                              \
>> -		struct_size((struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_section *)0, tcam, \
>> +	ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size_t(struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_section,  tcam, \
>>  			    1) -                                             \
>>  			sizeof(struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_entry),          \
>>  		sizeof(struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_entry))
> 
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> 
> but Intel ICE folks please speak up if this has a high chance of
> conflicts, I think I've seen some ICE DDP patches flying around :(

I haven't found anything that would conflict with this, esp. since it
implies no functional changes.
I agree it's been much needed, great, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

Olek