From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B30C77B76 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229685AbjDNJF3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:05:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40160 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229457AbjDNJF1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:05:27 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996D04EF2; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 02:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C4F5645AB; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 293CFC433EF; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:05:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1681463125; bh=RKUWjVPJrlvFOSvux9HcYl0d5UDv8c+EXyBgf50pelE=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mE442eTSMCUa1C9zYj7L4qpyrvhC5zrPs2rpEW2uH1GvQOSH3pMGef5IGz1qD/sf2 +xZb8ETgUWeUIcx9mWiF2EkWQ9AYyP5IXkClZh8BM94lNXXHpDNkRlMI+xlyeMOdcJ zIJbOsNdU77wL2A4MQzKTboe7YeuPgJISKZ8AlR/PwSzuCjQkYkTGFFZt8ValSde5v cBmHyFr1f1acGKWTKJTMWpVLZEigJKXA9nciQZsB/CpOYbY0O1uG1P8tgAVWdrtRFv oy2xsLn/FVCd5bxgOrWCXPc3/4ZUVpUC02oHgFUmOfIQBDi9Mpqpr6SKz/rQs1/pMz 3EEkhpIGvjztw== Message-ID: <1db257c0-ef31-ca03-2101-948974d31c42@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 11:05:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add 'snps,global-regs-starting-offset' quirk Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?U3RhbmxleSBDaGFuZ1vmmIzogrLlvrdd?= , Thinh Nguyen Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Felipe Balbi References: <20230412033006.10859-2-stanley_chang@realtek.com> <20230413042503.4047-1-stanley_chang@realtek.com> <167e4a8c-3ebd-92b7-1481-947f08901f97@kernel.org> <9f6abbe7a6fd479c98e2fd6c1080ad8a@realtek.com> <19946f94-db48-fe0d-722c-cbb45b8bd0ba@kernel.org> <313863df3a3b492aa7590e1354d22d8b@realtek.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <313863df3a3b492aa7590e1354d22d8b@realtek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/04/2023 04:12, Stanley Chang[昌育德] wrote: > >>>> Didn't you got already comment for this patch? How did you implement it? >>>> >>>> Also, I asked you multiple times: >>>> >>>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary >>>> people and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an >>>> older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure >>>> you base your patches on recent Linux kernel. >>>> >>>> I don't understand why you ignore this. >>>> >>>> NAK, patch is not correct. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>> >>> Thank you for your patient guidance. >>> Because I'm not familiar with the review process and didn't use >> scripts/get_maintainers.pl properly in the initial email thread. >>> Therefore, this series of errors was caused. Sorry for the confusion. >>> Now I know how to use the script properly. >>> After correcting the maintainer's suggestion, I'll restart a new email thread >> and review again. >> >> Did you respond to feedback you got about the property? Did reviewer agreed >> on your view after your feedback? >> >> If not, then why resending this patch? >> > > 1. Because you said, "This patch is incorrect". And I won't be cc'ing the proper maintainer. > I think I need to restart a new review process. > 2. Modify the previous reviewer's comments and fix the dtschema validation error. > > Am I misunderstanding what you mean? > Can I keep reviewing this patch on this email thread until consensus is reached with the reviewers? I guess confusion is because you never received response from Rob. I'll reply there. Best regards, Krzysztof