From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964801AbWIZVRb (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:17:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932419AbWIZVRb (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:17:31 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]:13757 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932417AbWIZVRa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:17:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VXz1EtDog4I6Cv2/W9ktvrHyFAptgeSed5tpM3jnMkc6bMxPwUqiionEFtuvrxFC/iUjzyUkAUPqXUXy7fyuKhTK2Hj0ixjw2fyVX18aVeOJ3HIEj259dc4ELBcT350+7X/gAy/lFfR6RjRtIV/lK0bovYIfCZFzZzWpr7Rnk7I= Message-ID: <1defaf580609261417v4d3ea0f3pb10699d60ad0323f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:17:29 +0200 From: "Haavard Skinnemoen" To: "David Woodhouse" Subject: Re: [PATCH] avr32 architecture Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard_Skinnemoen?=" , akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <1159304576.3309.54.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200609261601.k8QG1Txd005700@hera.kernel.org> <1159304576.3309.54.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/26/06, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 16:01 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > > [PATCH] avr32 architecture > > pmac /pmac/git/linux-2.6 $ make ARCH=avr32 headers_check > CHK include/linux/version.h > make[1]: `scripts/unifdef' is up to date. > CHECK include/asm/user.h > CHECK include/asm/unistd.h > /pmac/git/linux-2.6/usr/include/asm/unistd.h requires linux/linkage.h, which does not exist in exported headers Right. avr32-implement-kernel_execve.patch, which was flagged as "Will merge" by Andrew, fixes it by moving the #ifdef __KERNEL__ guard to cover everything but the __NR_foo definitions. So as long as that one's still scheduled for inclusion, I think sending a separate patch to fix this problem will do more harm than good. But thanks for testing :) Håvard