mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: "Nishanth Aravamudan" <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
	"Julien Desfossez" <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Vineeth Pillai" <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
	"Aubrey Li" <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Glexiner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Greg Kerr" <kerrnel@google.com>, "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	"Pawan Gupta" <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	vineeth@bitbyteword.org, "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	"Agata Gruza" <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
	"Antonio Gomez Iglesias" <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, "Dario Faggioli" <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
	"Paul Turner" <pjt@google.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Patrick Bellasi" <derkling@google.com>,
	"benbjiang(蒋彪)" <benbjiang@tencent.com>,
	"Alexandre Chartre" <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, OWeisse@umich.edu,
	"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
	"Junaid Shahid" <junaids@google.com>,
	"Jesse Barnes" <jsbarnes@google.com>,
	"Hyser,Chris" <chris.hyser@oracle.com>,
	"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>,
	"Josh Don" <joshdon@google.com>, "Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>,
	"Anand K. Mistry" <amistry@google.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@redhat.com>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] x86/bugs: Disable coresched on hardware that does not need it
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:37:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e370095-0f2b-7d5d-4ca6-198c56189309@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201113155520.GA2156685@google.com>



On 13.11.20 16:55, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
> 
>>> +static enum coresched_cmds coresched_cmd __ro_after_init = CORE_SCHED_SECURE;
>>> +
>>> +static int __init coresched_parse_cmdline(char *arg)
>>> +{
>>> +       if (!strcmp(arg, "off"))
>>> +               coresched_cmd = CORE_SCHED_OFF;
>>> +       else if (!strcmp(arg, "on"))
>>> +               coresched_cmd = CORE_SCHED_ON;
>>> +       else if (!strcmp(arg, "secure"))
>>> +               coresched_cmd = CORE_SCHED_SECURE;
>>> +       else
>>> +               pr_crit("Unsupported coresched=%s, defaulting to secure.\n",
>>> +                       arg);
>>> +
>>> +       return 0;
>>
>>
>> Instead of calling the matching function over and over again, can we just
>> configure a static branch (see below) based on the command line setting
>> here? Or do we not know about the bugs yet?
> [...]
>>> +static bool __coresched_supported(void)
>>> +{
>>> +       /* coreched=off command line option. */
>>> +       if (coresched_cmd_off())
>>> +               return false;
>>> +
>>> +       /*
>>> +        * Some arch may not need coresched, example some x86 may not need
>>> +        * coresched if coresched=secure option is passed (=secure is default).
>>> +        */
>>> +       return arch_allow_core_sched();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    void sched_core_get(void)
>>>    {
>>> +       if (!__coresched_supported())
>>> +               return;
>>
>> I would expect core scheduling to be basically an option that you set once
>> and never flip. This sounds like a prefect use case for a static branch to
>> me?
> 
> Something ike so then? If Ok, let me know if I can add your Reviewed-by tag.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> ---8<-----------------------
> 
> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: Add a coresched command line option
> 
> Some hardware such as certain AMD variants don't have cross-HT MDS/L1TF
> issues. Detect this and don't enable core scheduling as it can
> needlessly slow those device down.
> 
> However, some users may want core scheduling even if the hardware is
> secure. To support them, add a coresched= option which defaults to
> 'secure' and can be overridden to 'on' if the user wants to enable
> coresched even if the HW is not vulnerable. 'off' would disable
> core scheduling in any case.
> 
> Also add a sched_debug entry to indicate if core scheduling is turned on
> or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/cpu.h        |  1 +
>   include/linux/sched/smt.h  |  4 ++++
>   kernel/cpu.c               | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/sched/core.c        |  6 ++++++
>   kernel/sched/debug.c       |  4 ++++
>   6 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index dece79e4d1e9..7607c9cd7f0f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static void __init mds_select_mitigation(void);
>   static void __init mds_print_mitigation(void);
>   static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void);
>   static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void);
> +static void __init coresched_select(void);
> 
>   /* The base value of the SPEC_CTRL MSR that always has to be preserved. */
>   u64 x86_spec_ctrl_base;
> @@ -103,6 +104,9 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
>          if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_STIBP))
>                  x86_spec_ctrl_mask |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
> 
> +       /* Update whether core-scheduling is needed. */
> +       coresched_select();
> +
>          /* Select the proper CPU mitigations before patching alternatives: */
>          spectre_v1_select_mitigation();
>          spectre_v2_select_mitigation();
> @@ -1808,4 +1812,19 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_srbds(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *
>   {
>          return cpu_show_common(dev, attr, buf, X86_BUG_SRBDS);
>   }
> +
> +/*
> + * When coresched=secure command line option is passed (default), disable core
> + * scheduling if CPU does not have MDS/L1TF vulnerability.
> + */
> +static void __init coresched_select(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +       if (!coresched_cmd_secure())

Make this a positive branch instead please :).

/*
  * Disable core scheduling on non-MDS, non-L1TF systems
  * when coresched=secure (default)
  */
if (coresched_cmd_secure() &&
     !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) &&
     !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF))
         static_branch_disable(&sched_coresched_supported);

> +               return;
> +       if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) && !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF))
> +               static_branch_disable(&sched_coresched_supported);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>   #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
> index d6428aaf67e7..d1f1e64316d6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
> @@ -228,4 +228,5 @@ static inline int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval) { return 0;
>   extern bool cpu_mitigations_off(void);
>   extern bool cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt(void);
> 
> +extern bool coresched_cmd_secure(void);
>   #endif /* _LINUX_CPU_H_ */
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/smt.h b/include/linux/sched/smt.h
> index 59d3736c454c..561064eb3268 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/smt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/smt.h
> @@ -17,4 +17,8 @@ static inline bool sched_smt_active(void) { return false; }
> 
>   void arch_smt_update(void);
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +extern struct static_key_true sched_coresched_supported;
> +#endif
> +
>   #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 6ff2578ecf17..b1cdfc7616b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -2552,3 +2552,41 @@ bool cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt(void)
>          return cpu_mitigations == CPU_MITIGATIONS_AUTO_NOSMT;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt);
> +
> +/*
> + * These are used for a global "coresched=" cmdline option for controlling
> + * core scheduling. Note that core sched may be needed for usecases other
> + * than security as well.
> + */
> +enum coresched_cmds {
> +       CORE_SCHED_OFF,
> +       CORE_SCHED_SECURE,
> +       CORE_SCHED_ON,
> +};
> +
> +static enum coresched_cmds coresched_cmd __ro_after_init = CORE_SCHED_SECURE;
> +
> +static int __init coresched_parse_cmdline(char *arg)
> +{
> +       if (!strcmp(arg, "off"))
> +               coresched_cmd = CORE_SCHED_OFF;
> +       else if (!strcmp(arg, "on"))
> +               coresched_cmd = CORE_SCHED_ON;
> +       else if (!strcmp(arg, "secure"))
> +               coresched_cmd = CORE_SCHED_SECURE;
> +       else
> +               pr_crit("Unsupported coresched=%s, defaulting to secure.\n",
> +                       arg);
> +
> +       if (coresched_cmd == CORE_SCHED_OFF)
> +               static_branch_disable(&sched_coresched_supported);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("coresched", coresched_parse_cmdline);
> +
> +/* coresched=secure */
> +bool coresched_cmd_secure(void)
> +{
> +       return coresched_cmd == CORE_SCHED_SECURE;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresched_cmd_secure);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 5ed26b469ed6..959fddf7d8de 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -333,8 +333,12 @@ static void __sched_core_disable(void)
>          printk("core sched disabled\n");
>   }
> 
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sched_coresched_supported);
> +
>   void sched_core_get(void)
>   {
> +       if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_coresched_supported))
> +               return;
>          mutex_lock(&sched_core_mutex);
>          if (!sched_core_count++)
>                  __sched_core_enable();
> @@ -343,6 +347,8 @@ void sched_core_get(void)
> 
>   void sched_core_put(void)
>   {
> +       if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_coresched_supported))
> +               return;
>          mutex_lock(&sched_core_mutex);
>          if (!--sched_core_count)
>                  __sched_core_disable();
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 88bf45267672..935b68be18cd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,10 @@ static void sched_debug_header(struct seq_file *m)
>                  "sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling",
>                  sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling,
>                  sched_tunable_scaling_names[sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling]);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +       SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-40s: %d\n", "core_sched_enabled",
> +                  !!static_branch_likely(&__sched_core_enabled));
> +#endif
>          SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
>   }
> 
> 

[...]

> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index a36f08d74e09..8de377dc8592 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -698,6 +698,15 @@
>                         /proc/<pid>/coredump_filter.
>                         See also Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst.
> 
> +       coresched=

It would be nice to list the possible arguments here too.

> +                       [SCHED_CORE] Enable/disable the core scheduling feature.
> +                       A value of 'on' keeps coresched on always. A value of

This reads as if coresched=on means that all your tasks are core 
scheduled. I'd prefer if you could clarify the option a bit to mean that 
this *plus* tagging gets your core scheduling.


Alex

> +                       'off' keeps coresched off always. A value of 'secure'
> +                       keeps it on only if the system has vulnerabilities. Defaults
> +                       to 'secure'. A user who has a non-security usecase that needs
> +                       core scheduling, such as improving performance of VMs by
> +                       tagging vCPU should pass 'on' to force it on.
> +
>         coresight_cpu_debug.enable
>                         [ARM,ARM64]
>                         Format: <bool>





Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879




  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11 21:10 [RFC 0/2] Do not slow down some AMD devices with coresched Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-11 21:10 ` [RFC 1/2] x86/bugs: Disable coresched on hardware that does not need it Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-11 21:14   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-11 22:00     ` Alexander Graf
2020-11-11 22:13       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-11 22:15         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-11 22:29           ` Alexander Graf
2020-11-12 13:40             ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-12 14:40               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-12 20:09                 ` Alexander Graf
2020-11-13 15:55                   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-16 15:37                     ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2020-11-12 14:52               ` Alexander Graf
2020-11-12 15:28                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-12 20:01                   ` Alexander Graf
2020-11-11 21:10 ` [RFC 2/2] sched/debug: Add debug information about whether coresched is enabled Joel Fernandes (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e370095-0f2b-7d5d-4ca6-198c56189309@amazon.com \
    --to=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=OWeisse@umich.edu \
    --cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=amistry@google.com \
    --cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=derkling@google.com \
    --cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kerrnel@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®