mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c:114:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:57:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e65634e-9184-d93f-6477-bbe96193a5e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f51b4bd-3bc2-487b-aacd-9d0a1129c615@app.fastmail.com>



On 11/9/2022 3:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022, at 04:54, kernel test robot wrote:
>> tree:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>> master
>> head:   f141df371335645ce29a87d9683a3f79fba7fd67
>> commit: d803336abdbc1bfacdb32b2cf9f4fdbee072b8ee ARM: mm: kill unused
>> runtime hook arch_iounmap()
> 
> Thanks for the report, but I think it might be better to stop
> reporting address space violations from this patch, because it
> only started showing existing known issues with a slightly
> different error message, or flagging issues on arm32 that
> were previously shown on other architectures.

Hi Arnd,

Thanks for your advice, we'll add the commit to ignore list.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

> 
>> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>     drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c:98:12: sparse: sparse: incorrect
>> type in assignment (different address spaces) @@     expected void *va
>> @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>     drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c:98:12: sparse:     expected void
>> *va
>>     drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c:98:12: sparse:     got void
>> [noderef] __iomem *
>>>> drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c:114:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *io_addr @@     got void *va @@
> 
>        Arnd
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09  3:54 kernel test robot
2022-11-09  7:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-09  7:57   ` Chen, Rong A [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-06  4:54 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e65634e-9184-d93f-6477-bbe96193a5e3@intel.com \
    --to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®