From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753476AbdBKJRU (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2017 04:17:20 -0500 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:44776 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752579AbdBKJRS (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2017 04:17:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3 - a couple of regression fixes. To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Rosin References: <1485981657-14586-1-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> <1485981657-14586-2-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> <2648bf01-840e-d555-8a65-03d1d13c6ed2@kernel.org> <20170211071753.GB1345@kroah.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ken Lin , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org From: Jonathan Cameron Message-ID: <1e730cd9-8cb9-3752-cea0-58d4cd67695f@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:16:36 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170211071753.GB1345@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/17 07:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>> The following changes since commit 5c113b5e0082e90d2e1c7b12e96a7b8cf0623e27: >>>> >>>> iio: dht11: Use usleep_range instead of msleep for start signal (2017-01-22 13:35:40 +0000) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-4.10c >>> >>> It's a bit late for 4.10 for me, can I just pull this into my -next >>> branch and will they get to 4.10.1 properly? Meaning, do that have cc: >>> stable markings on them? Or do you want to fix that up and resend this >>> request? >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> You should ask Ken Lin who has the HW and who is apparently affected. >> I think it's bad that you are willing to have a known regression hit >> v4.10 when all was fine in v4.9. Or perhaps you didn't realize that >> the regression was from this cycle? >> >> The fixes are obvious. I don't understand your hesitation. > > My "hesitation" is that I'm about to get on a plane for a day or so and > don't have the time to get this to Linus before 4.10-final is out this > Sunday. Getting it in a week later should be ok, we all make mistakes, > as long as we fix them it's all good, and for 4.10.1 should be ok. Who knows, maybe Linus will delay another week anyway ;) Wasn't looking that clear when I sent these out. >>From my point of view, sure 4.10.1 should be fine. I'll put stable CCs on them. Will send the pull out shortly so I don't forget about them. Pull request clearly now becomes first set of fixes for 4.11. Jonathan > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >