From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: "Lai, Yi" <yi1.lai@linux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
yi1.lai@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/x86: Fix sysret_rip assertion failure on FRED systems
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 16:39:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ede823e-080e-4283-a018-efd62e0c1579@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acDV51/6Nml3dzOk@ly-workstation>
On 23/03/2026 5:55 am, Lai, Yi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 08:50:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 3/20/26 08:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> First, CPUID doesn't tell you if FRED is in use. Is it even on by
>>>> default yet? There might not be a better way to do this than checking
>>>> CPUID, but checking CPUID is imprecise at best.
>>> A reliable way to distinguish IDT and FRED mode is to:
>>>
>>> 1) Load $3 into %fs (x86_64) or %gs (i386) (i.e. whichever isn't thread
>>> local stoage)
>>> 2) execute a breakpoint, ignore the signal
>>> 3) Look to see whether %fs/%gs holds 3 or 0
>>>
>>> IRET has a fun behaviour where it zeroes NULL selectors even if they had
>>> a non-zero RPL.
>>>
>>> ERETU doesn't do this; Andy Luto and I asked for this minor information
>>> leak to be removed, and Intel agreed as it served no purpose anyone
>>> could identify.
>>>
>>> As a consequence, you can use it to determine whether the kernel used
>>> IRET or ERET to return back to userspace.
>> I was thinking of just grepping /proc/cpuinfo for "fred", but that
>> sounds much more fun! :)
> Thank you both for the review and suggestions. The behavioral difference
> between IRET and ERETU is a more robust way to detect FRED activation
> than checking CPUID.
>
> How about the following implementation to add a helper function to
> determine if FRED is enabled at runtime:
>
> static void empty_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx_void)
> {
> }
>
> static bool is_fred_enabled(void)
> {
> unsigned short gs_val;
>
> sethandler(SIGTRAP, empty_handler, 0);
What about setting SIG_IGN instead?
>
> /*
> * Distinguish IDT and FRED mode by loading GS with a non-zero RPL and
> * triggering an exception:
> * IDT (IRET) clears RPL bits of NULL selectors.
> * FRED (ERETU) preserves them.
> *
> * If GS is loaded with 3 (Index=0, RPL=3), and we trigger an exception:
> * Legacy should restore GS as 0.
> * FRED should preserve GS as 3.
> */
> asm volatile(
> "mov $3, %%ax\n\t"
> "mov %%ax, %%gs\n\t"
> "int3\n\t"
> "mov %%gs, %%ax\n\t"
> "mov %%ax, %0\n\t"
> : "=r" (gs_val)
> :
> : "ax", "memory"
> );
asm volatile (
"mov %[rpl3], %%gs\n\t"
"int3\n\t"
"mov %%gs, %[res]"
: [res] "=r" (gs_val)
: [rpl3] "r" (3));
No need for any clobbers. Let the compiler do the hard work for you.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 6:33 Yi Lai
2026-03-20 14:31 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 15:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-20 15:50 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-22 6:13 ` Xin Li
2026-03-23 6:06 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-23 16:19 ` Xin Li
2026-03-23 19:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 19:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-23 20:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-24 14:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-24 14:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-24 14:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-24 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-22 20:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 5:55 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-23 16:39 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2026-03-24 1:28 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-24 11:08 ` David Laight
2026-03-24 14:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ede823e-080e-4283-a018-efd62e0c1579@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome