From: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
<ogabbay@kernel.org>, <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<maciej.falkowski@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<sonal.santan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] accel/amdxdna: Support read-only user-pointer BO mappings
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:29:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f3a273f-ba47-08b2-92d4-b2d656241669@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4886d87-b359-4bf8-ae2c-02e17664bd8e@amd.com>
On 3/31/26 09:13, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
>
> On 3/26/26 11:27, Lizhi Hou wrote:
>> From: Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>
>>
>> Update the amdxdna user-pointer (ubuf) BO path to support creating
>> buffer
>> objects from read-only user mappings.
>>
>> Detect read-only VMAs by checking VMA permissions across all user
>> virtual
>> address ranges associated with the BO. When all entries are
>> read-only, pin
>> user pages without FOLL_WRITE and export the resulting dmabuf as
>> read-only
>> (O_RDONLY).
>>
>> This allows userptr BOs backed by read-only mappings to be safely
>> imported
>> and used without requiring write access, which was previously
>> rejected due
>> to unconditional FOLL_WRITE usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_ubuf.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_ubuf.c
>> b/drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_ubuf.c
>> index 4c0647057759..1a0e2a274170 100644
>> --- a/drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_ubuf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_ubuf.c
>> @@ -125,6 +125,27 @@ static const struct dma_buf_ops
>> amdxdna_ubuf_dmabuf_ops = {
>> .vunmap = amdxdna_ubuf_vunmap,
>> };
>> +static int readonly_va_entry(struct amdxdna_drm_va_entry *va_ent)
>> +{
>> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
>> +
>> + vma = find_vma(mm, va_ent->vaddr);
>> + if (!vma ||
>> + vma->vm_start > va_ent->vaddr ||
>> + vma->vm_end < va_ent->vaddr ||
>> + vma->vm_end - va_ent->vaddr < va_ent->len)
>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>
> The check on line "vma->vm_end < va_ent->vaddr" appears to be
> unreachable.
> find_vma() is documented to return the first VMA where vma->vm_end >
> addr, so
> if vma is non-NULL, this condition can never be true.
Sure. I will remove it.
>
>> + else
>> + ret = vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE ? 0 : 1;
>> +
>> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> struct dma_buf *amdxdna_get_ubuf(struct drm_device *dev,
>> u32 num_entries, void __user *va_entries)
>> {
>> @@ -134,6 +155,7 @@ struct dma_buf *amdxdna_get_ubuf(struct
>> drm_device *dev,
>> struct amdxdna_ubuf_priv *ubuf;
>> u32 npages, start = 0;
>> struct dma_buf *dbuf;
>> + bool readonly = true;
>> int i, ret;
>> DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(exp_info);
>> @@ -172,6 +194,10 @@ struct dma_buf *amdxdna_get_ubuf(struct
>> drm_device *dev,
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto free_ent;
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Pin pages as writable as long as not all entries are
>> read-only. */
>> + if (readonly && readonly_va_entry(&va_ent[i]) != 1)
>> + readonly = false;
>> }
>
> The check "!= 1" treats errors the same as writable VMAs.
> readonly_va_entry()
> returns -ENOENT for errors, 0 for writable, and 1 for read-only.
>
> Extra error handling maybe needed?
The idea is to specifically handle the readonly_va_entry() == 1 case.
For -ENOENT and 0, it fallbacks to writeable and the error handling will
be done by checking pin_user_pages_fast() return value.
Lizhi
>
>> ubuf->nr_pages = exp_info.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> @@ -194,7 +220,7 @@ struct dma_buf *amdxdna_get_ubuf(struct
>> drm_device *dev,
>> npages = va_ent[i].len >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> ret = pin_user_pages_fast(va_ent[i].vaddr, npages,
>> - FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_LONGTERM,
>> + (readonly ? 0 : FOLL_WRITE) | FOLL_LONGTERM,
>> &ubuf->pages[start]);
>> if (ret >= 0) {
>> start += ret;
>> @@ -211,7 +237,7 @@ struct dma_buf *amdxdna_get_ubuf(struct
>> drm_device *dev,
>> exp_info.ops = &amdxdna_ubuf_dmabuf_ops;
>> exp_info.priv = ubuf;
>> - exp_info.flags = O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC;
>> + exp_info.flags = (readonly ? O_RDONLY : O_RDWR) | O_CLOEXEC;
>> dbuf = dma_buf_export(&exp_info);
>> if (IS_ERR(dbuf)) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 16:27 Lizhi Hou
2026-03-31 16:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-03-31 16:29 ` Lizhi Hou [this message]
2026-03-31 16:32 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f3a273f-ba47-08b2-92d4-b2d656241669@amd.com \
--to=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.falkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jhugo@quicinc.com \
--cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®