From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jaehoon Kim <jhkim@linux.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Cc: david@kernel.org, svens@linux.ibm.com, freimuth@linux.ibm.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:51:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f64ec8b-2e22-42c7-b823-74d2bc30f3aa@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720222238.1576-1-jhkim@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/20/26 6:22 PM, Jaehoon Kim wrote:
> FOLL_LONGTERM pinning fails for some memory types, such as file-backed
> guest memory. As a result, kvm_s390_adapter_map() returns -EINVAL and
> irqfd adapter registration fails even though interrupt delivery could
> still work via the existing non-atomic path.
>
> When FOLL_LONGTERM pinning fails, verify that the page is accessible
> using a short-term pin instead. If the short-term pin succeeds,
> immediately unpin the page and return success. The non-atomic irqfd
> path already performs short-term pinning for interrupt delivery, so
> this restores the previous behavior for memory that cannot be pinned
> long-term.
>
> Fixes: adcd5b3e758b ("KVM: s390: Add map/unmap ioctl and clean mappings post-guest")
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Kim <jhkim@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 9e3e6b0d72ad..4b68e0cb51f6 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -2520,8 +2520,19 @@ static int kvm_s390_adapter_map(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id, __u64 addr)
> map->addr = host_addr;
> map->page = pin_map_page(kvm, host_addr, FOLL_LONGTERM);
> if (!map->page) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> + /*
> + * Long-term pinning may fail for memory types such as file-backed
> + * memory. Check whether short-term pinning is possible so that the
> + * non-atomic irqfd path can handle interrupt injection.
> + */
> + map->page = pin_map_page(kvm, host_addr, 0);
> + if (!map->page) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + unpin_user_page(map->page);
> + kfree(map);
> + return 0;
This makes sense, but what happens later on the kvm_s390_adapter_unmap?
Won't we return -ENOENT because nothing was in the list?
Is it worth detecting/recognizing this case? I could think of 2 ways...
1) re-doing the above test during unmap
2) stashing an entry in adapter->maps but with a new flag that indicates
it was approved for short-term pinning only (e.g. return NULL
immediately if a match is found during get_map_info() with this flag
set), and during kvm_s390_adapter_unmap() and
kvm_s390_unmap_all_adapters() just remove it from the list without doing
any unpin/page dirtying.
#2 might be a little more code but sounds cleaner?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 22:22 Jaehoon Kim
2026-07-20 22:55 ` Douglas Freimuth
2026-07-22 15:51 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2026-07-22 17:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 18:05 ` JAEHOON KIM
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f64ec8b-2e22-42c7-b823-74d2bc30f3aa@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freimuth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jhkim@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome