From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938631AbdD0StR (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:49:17 -0400 Received: from smtprelay.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:45066 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933007AbdD0StL (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:49:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: disallow building designware_pcm as a module To: Mark Brown , Takashi Iwai References: <20170418151834.c7e5fivmgn73sbwd@sirena.org.uk> <1492532010.28092.12.camel@v3.sk> <20170418171519.csiftftd434psyn5@sirena.org.uk> <2e39b000-bf25-6447-b53b-047401041f4e@synopsys.com> <1492618461.28092.18.camel@v3.sk> <03a3fbbb-7221-f4ee-5b1b-8fff518ea82c@synopsys.com> <20170420194646.qcpu7w3acjyfmeu5@sirena.org.uk> <376c5933-9321-5399-74c7-6fd4943fab3d@synopsys.com> <20170421104915.x7gxt5yqcuewa7rv@sirena.org.uk> CC: Jose Abreu , Lubomir Rintel , , , Arnd Bergmann From: Jose Abreu Message-ID: <1fa94590-3dbf-922d-4fe7-1a507eec4b32@synopsys.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:49:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170421104915.x7gxt5yqcuewa7rv@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.107.19.111] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 21-04-2017 11:49, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:39:30PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> Jose Abreu wrote: >>> Maybe rename to "dwc-i2s.c" and "dwc-pcm.c" (as the folder is >>> called "dwc") and let the module still be called "designware-i2s"? >> Lubomir's patch keeps the module name intact. My point is that rename >> of a file isn't nice to look at the git commit history, so it's better >> to be avoided as much as possible. But in this case, it looks >> unavoidable. > Right. Renaming the source file is the lesser evil, it's possible > people might have the module name in their configuration for their > systems somewhere. I agree. I just noticed today that without a valid license tag we get unresolved symbols when inserting pcm module so this patch is really needed as a fix. Lubomir, could you address the review comments and resend? If you are not available let me know and I will fix and resend the patch with your sign-off. Best regards, Jose Miguel Abreu