mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
To: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>
Cc: Alan Mizrahi <alan@mizrahi.com.ve>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: fix wrong dmi_match on PC Engines APU LEDs
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:40:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fd03089-2e39-1463-31bb-26de1f63c046@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1803181509330.7595@T420s>

Hi Hans,

On 03/18/2018 03:24 PM, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote:
> Hi Jacek
> 
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2018, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> 
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On 03/05/2018 06:09 PM, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote:
>>> APU has compared to APU2 no DMI_BOARD_NAME.
>>> Use DMI_PRODUCT_NAME instead.
>>
>> Could we have the commit message more expressive?
>>
>> Is it that now this driver doesn't work for APU board?
> 
> Yes it doesn't work for my APU board.
> I've already checked the updated driver in -next
> 
> As you can see here
> # grep . /sys/class/dmi/id/*
> /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date:04/05/2014
> /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_vendor:coreboot
> /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version:SageBios_PCEngines_APU-45
> /sys/class/dmi/id/chassis_type:3
> /sys/class/dmi/id/chassis_vendor:PC Engines
> /sys/class/dmi/id/modalias:dmi:bvncoreboot:bvrSageBios_PCEngines_APU-45:bd04/05/2014:svnPCEngines:pnAPU:pvr1.0:cvnPCEngines:ct3:cvr:
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_family:None Provided
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_name:APU
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_serial:XXXXXXX
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_version:1.0
> /sys/class/dmi/id/sys_vendor:PC Engines
> /sys/class/dmi/id/uevent:MODALIAS=dmi:bvncoreboot:bvrSageBios_PCEngines_APU-45:bd04/05/2014:svnPCEngines:pnAPU:pvr1.0:cvnPCEngines:ct3:cvr:
> 
> there is no board name on APU.
> 
> here is the output from my APU2 board
> # grep . /sys/class/dmi/id/*
> /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date:02/28/2017
> /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_vendor:coreboot
> /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version:4.0.7
> /sys/class/dmi/id/board_name:APU2
> /sys/class/dmi/id/board_serial:XXXXXXX
> /sys/class/dmi/id/board_vendor:PC Engines
> /sys/class/dmi/id/board_version:1.0
> /sys/class/dmi/id/chassis_type:3
> /sys/class/dmi/id/chassis_vendor:PC Engines
> /sys/class/dmi/id/modalias:dmi:bvncoreboot:bvr4.0.7:bd02/28/2017:svnPCEngines:pnAPU2:pvr1.0:rvnPCEngines:rnAPU2:rvr1.0:cvnPCEngines:ct3:cvr:
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_name:APU2
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_serial:XXXXXX
> /sys/class/dmi/id/product_version:1.0
> /sys/class/dmi/id/sys_vendor:PC Engines
> /sys/class/dmi/id/uevent:MODALIAS=dmi:bvncoreboot:bvr4.0.7:bd02/28/2017:svnPCEngines:pnAPU2:pvr1.0:rvnPCEngines:rnAPU2:rvr1.0:cvnPCEngines:ct3:cvr:
> 
> As you can see here for APU2 the board_name is set.

Thanks for this explanation. I modified the commit message
accordingly and applied the patch to the for-next branch
in the following form:

commit 92d7ec1d71e351f11ba503369eb78225510cfcc7
Author: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 5 18:09:10 2018 +0100

    leds: Fix wrong dmi_match on PC Engines APU LEDs

    BIOS on APU board doesn't expose board_name property, and thus
    we have to rely on the product_name instead.

    Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>


Please let me know if you have any comments.

Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

>>
>> If it fails here, then how it is possible that it succeeds
>> in the apu_led_init() ?
>>
> 
> in apu_led_init() is a check for product_name for both both boards.
> Ans this succeeds
> 
> Thus the fix here
>> -     if (dmi_match(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "APU")) {
>> +     if (dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "APU")) {
> 
> I can rewrite the patch to catch both board_name and product_name for the 
> APU board, and add a better commit log.
> 
> They are more recent bios updates for this board, but the are specified as 
> "beta" so I'm afraid of an update. I have no hardware to recover a 
> "damaged" SPI flash chip.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-03-20 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 17:09 Hans Ulli Kroll
2018-03-10 21:13 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-03-18 14:24   ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2018-03-20 19:40     ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1fd03089-2e39-1463-31bb-26de1f63c046@gmail.com \
    --to=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@mizrahi.com.ve \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=ulli.kroll@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®