From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E272C4332F for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 07:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232666AbjKGHqN (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2023 02:46:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53638 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233642AbjKGHqK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2023 02:46:10 -0500 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578D3F3; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 23:46:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SPgDb63d2z1P82L; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 15:42:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.69.30.204] (10.69.30.204) by dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 15:46:04 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/12] netdev: support binding dma-buf to netdevice To: Mina Almasry , , , , , , , CC: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Ilias Apalodimas , Arnd Bergmann , David Ahern , Willem de Bruijn , Shuah Khan , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , Shakeel Butt , Jeroen de Borst , Praveen Kaligineedi , Willem de Bruijn , Kaiyuan Zhang References: <20231106024413.2801438-1-almasrymina@google.com> <20231106024413.2801438-5-almasrymina@google.com> From: Yunsheng Lin Message-ID: <1fee982f-1e96-4ae8-ede0-7e57bf84c5f7@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 15:46:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20231106024413.2801438-5-almasrymina@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.69.30.204] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/11/6 10:44, Mina Almasry wrote: > + > +void __netdev_devmem_binding_free(struct netdev_dmabuf_binding *binding) > +{ > + size_t size, avail; > + > + gen_pool_for_each_chunk(binding->chunk_pool, > + netdev_devmem_free_chunk_owner, NULL); > + > + size = gen_pool_size(binding->chunk_pool); > + avail = gen_pool_avail(binding->chunk_pool); > + > + if (!WARN(size != avail, "can't destroy genpool. size=%lu, avail=%lu", > + size, avail)) > + gen_pool_destroy(binding->chunk_pool); Is there any other place calling the gen_pool_destroy() when the above warning is triggered? Do we have a leaking for binding->chunk_pool? > + > + dma_buf_unmap_attachment(binding->attachment, binding->sgt, > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > + dma_buf_detach(binding->dmabuf, binding->attachment); > + dma_buf_put(binding->dmabuf); > + kfree(binding); > +} > +