From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DAFC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232042AbiGFRJ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:09:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230243AbiGFRJ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:09:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311A21EAF3 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id be14-20020a05600c1e8e00b003a04a458c54so9335872wmb.3 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 10:09:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=5LUOM8ZYJNqDNXNRkK8SW6v1KeODGn/t/tSrSeB93Hg=; b=FWxQ9w9QQNjX8fhNNM4ShlZTIrizS+PKUFTG21pr1iRgQ7Vf64He23QLE9Bp6vZC9d QZu2/gYfSpYUu+IGln2mRJLyYTBfq/2oQnalM/9l2402od6QikiGfzuLSKyyHtUvM0ND H8c1Ve5FE8EFWb3V5w4SgEjotxtGfnYtzZH/0u8do8Ur8T0RcZirfEQuMgVoNg6hEjJl IFvuFdAFs7G+vCfMwzF+R9e5ptnM53k9g6vDUW9c9MrHQ6945QoFT/IiVHoXUxXm909V DfjWv/xGi1nJsBJDn0frsfD/P79LZl9yDkDVyV2rDWgVln6fVNSHmzJB+nvuFcX8uCDE vGYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=5LUOM8ZYJNqDNXNRkK8SW6v1KeODGn/t/tSrSeB93Hg=; b=SpJflemDQ07vzGH75OJjQfPVtDftNoDi1hzRpqJ50CIzRkgF1GmKyao4vxuKpyN4+W d/Bvli4FU85HgjEARxLNUP56SmjGUIfbGkhV4jaYveV2fF0YoVu51EjlTNi4AUXvtJSi rcmwdswQ062dwaNZgaJ5bEeRfl5QZQIY5LibbIk61yGKfgLre5B/b4KNCmdthNeNlv1/ 585l4kFeRFVSRu6ucnj5XQ6mvyQtAC5yzRHU9FQnJUeD8f2VXinXDILiXnLRs4x7PzdA VI9NYZWxydJOB52JDVkyEtJjaxSl1xIzr0MIwAtekq8IiLX/QfqflymsU7OBmttDmqzx EulA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9YQoXH8uBeQ6ECvDVzTlqzlok0lXbg3Mar9OhUABs7VLDSV7GP HbRg28gEQPcIrJsq6Qs4Kk4hzw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tDs+r809drkm9fTo8mDedQDX5NO3elMnVmkCGdj1wZQpsTYCLXuaPJsjJ/fdV04pS7uHNxFg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e14:b0:3a0:2bba:4b2e with SMTP id ay20-20020a05600c1e1400b003a02bba4b2emr42964111wmb.196.1657127362770; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 10:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (82-65-169-74.subs.proxad.net. [82.65.169.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16-20020adfe950000000b0021d70a871cbsm5605291wrn.32.2022.07.06.10.09.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 10:09:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <20220705142444.17063-1-pboos@baylibre.com> <1jmtdnwd7y.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> <20220706124139.GB492220@roeck-us.net> <1j8rp6z720.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> <20220706164325.GA776177@roeck-us.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.3; emacs 27.1 From: Jerome Brunet To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong , Philippe Boos , Wim Van Sebroeck , Kevin Hilman , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: meson: keep running if already active Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:00:39 +0200 In-reply-to: <20220706164325.GA776177@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <1j4jzuyxq8.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 06 Jul 2022 at 09:43, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> > [ ... ] > >> >> No worries. That being said, I have gone over >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst >> >> It just says that Reviewed-by sent on the list should be collected for >> the following version. Nothing against adding the tag if the job has >> been done, on or off list. Same goes for Suggested-by, Tested-by, etc. >> >> If I missed something or it is non-written rule, please let me know. > > Your interpretation is quite a strict one. I don't think there is a rule > that states that tags not sent to a list must not be collected. > > Anyway, I would have called it common sense, especially since it does > happen that someone accidentally hits "reply" instead of "reply all" > and replies end up not being sent to the list. If you expect me to dig > through e-mail headers to determine if you meant your tags to be published > or not, sorry, that won't happen. Do not send me e-mails with any tags > unless you accept that they may be published. > > Guenter Exactly. Not expecting anything. I'm 100% aligned with you. Maybe this is where is misunderstanding is. The Reviewed-by was there when Philippe sent his mail. I was meant to be there and taken. Plain and simple. No other expectation whatsoever. I'm not asking for the tag to dropped, quite the opposite actually.