From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9657DC3A5A1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6998222CED for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="rH7Gn3Aj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726709AbfH1PMG (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:12:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:34757 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726534AbfH1PMG (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:12:06 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s18so212505wrn.1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=P0hG9q4LB7iGekm1JhwQRUtYrz5muvxkyOofP3RfFhA=; b=rH7Gn3AjKHZbFLaxdTydl+21XtDp/c3XOzAXQeUr7/glUovX6NNiTZr6F09ghOMISm N6EGUzPcQ+j22h6uCr+YjcOxfPKeSEV6y7X7Cr+oJ/cXz6Nu+lerCI1Jl6V9w9BOFwA/ bCLk2BxHpVQExy2rq6Lhx6ZvhF0GRXs/nU5nV8zaxcriyblTbRAfiN+4jqNng2LaPPBP 9OBJ5qMhKXkQNJzA+GN9qnja/4Od162cn/7fhcCya1WIrBB9BXD7vx7YRZmgHEJFEhKY fm8zZoVZWW3qXG1qljLtob6+3JshgCTIv8sYXm7jcxhurVTbysO4LyTyId6dmXHZpmZL W9nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=P0hG9q4LB7iGekm1JhwQRUtYrz5muvxkyOofP3RfFhA=; b=tBQaqNHPNDDnHp9YL/Pw2E4Ng6NSW2CJvdMM0x/oTuqtkbG95yi0RARRO29j73L0+b 4jZS94aTjp2/Lzb3+Tv39qCBJttpC6bNkTVWEvL9myMzSHVJN9rd8+KQ3lCb1XUC56Fx uTwbnOSWdpSalVxqiIbkZnn1l2ZQ7zcVC4VHCiRumSzwsRdXOA8I1RgrcdoKJe3vZFdG xA/T87G3nBD21z0L+wVN9/IpJO0Bv0+OQK5vigSKzQrt+EcntpkCaxHzUAlpP6OoTYCo luzGR0QcCF8tEISdUveHF9//3bEt8SXjB3ISCVTZW+5CmQUfvhXrbSG4LsXkQ93/Obu9 J/jw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbn/mZHGHYV32WuggYiEFU88fgPslS8qkdgcwzYOlcU4xzGxUf VVUpDKWZJOBC7dv8QoBKUWiOcg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4/oPu11MT6odSjP8m1t6PJbsEBeAeOhlbcfVkXq2dmrdFzJWmAdZ/CRF08N4B8WACk/3F6w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd84:: with SMTP id q4mr5148814wrj.232.1567005124161; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (lmontsouris-657-1-212-31.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.63.244.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d17sm2549897wrm.52.2019.08.28.08.12.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:12:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Jerome Brunet To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: meson: g12a: add tdm resets In-Reply-To: <7h36hltjoc.fsf@baylibre.com> References: <20190820121551.18398-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <7hh862tbt2.fsf@baylibre.com> <1j4l217m4h.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> <7h36hltjoc.fsf@baylibre.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:12:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1jlfvdnx31.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 28 Aug 2019 at 08:05, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jerome Brunet writes: > >> On Tue 27 Aug 2019 at 16:42, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> >>> Jerome Brunet writes: >>> >>>> This patchset adds the dedicated reset of the tdm formatters which >>>> have been added on the g12a SoC family. Using these help with the channel >>>> mapping when the formatter uses more than 1 i2s lane. >>> >>> Because I forgot^W waited on this, we did the meson-g12a-common split, >>> so this no longer applies cleanly. Could you rebase this on current v5.4/dt64 >>> and I'll queue it for v5.4/dt64. >> >> Acutally it was already not applying when I sent this v1 ... >> .. which is why I sent a v2 [0] ;) >> >> [0]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190823154432.16268-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com > > Oops, I saw there was a v2, but I missed that in my `git pw` because v2 > of the series had an "ASoC:" prefix in the cover letter, not an "arm64: > dts" one, so I skimmed past it. Oh ! indeed and this prefix makes no sense. Sorry about that > > Kevin