From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>,
mturquette@baylibre.com
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: support regmap
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:30:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jzgvnfdng.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1j1r9kobln.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
On Wed 02 Jun 2021 at 11:32, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
> On Wed 02 Jun 2021 at 10:21, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> On 6/2/21 10:18 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Peng Fan (OSS) (2021-05-28 04:34:00)
>>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>>>>
>>>> To i.MX8ULP, a PCC register provides clk(mux, gate, divider) and peripheral
>>>> reset functionality, so we need make sure the access to the PCC register
>>>> be protected to avoid concurrent access from clk and reset subsystem.
>>>>
>>>> So let's use regmap here.
>>>>
>>>> The i.MX specific code will be posted if this patchset is ok for you.
>>>
>>> We have a couple regmap clk drivers in the tree. Either combine the
>>> different regmap clk drivers or duplicate it into the imx directory. I'd
>>> prefer we combine them but last time I couldn't agree on the approach
>>> when Jerome wanted to do it. Maybe now is the time to combine them all
>>> into one common piece of code.
>>
>> IMHO for the basic drivers, such as gate, divider, mux, mux-div, etc... it makes
>> no sense to have them in an arch specific subdir, like meson.
>
> Indeed, those basic types were not meant to remain platform
> specific. Some framework (ASoC for ex) make heavy use of regmap and
> could welcome regmap based basic clock types.
>
> At the time, Stephen (qcom) and I (meson) had slightly different
> approaches. Before having those types spread through the kernel, I think
> testing things out was a good thing ... this is why these are platform
> specific ATM.
>
> It's been 3 years now ... and it has not been a total disaster :)
>
> In the end things are not so different. Let's compare:
> a. Both have a generic "clk_regmap" type common to all regmap based
> types. This is very useful to easily fix the regmap pointer in static
> clocks (which are heavily used by both platform)
>
> b. Meson uses a generic pointer to store the type specific info.
> Qcom embeds the generic clk_regmap into the specific type one.
> => In the end, I don't see any advantage to the meson
> approach. Switching to the qcom method would be quite a big bang
> for meson but it is doable (nothing difficult, just a huge line count)
>
> c. Qcom basic regmap type deviates a bit from the regular basic ones
> when it comes to the actual data. The qcom "clk_regmap" also provides
> the gate, mux have the qcom "parent_map". In meson, I tried to keep as
> close as possible to regular basic types ... at least what they were 3
> years ago. Only the register poking part should be different actually.
> => I'd be in favor of keeping close to meson here.
>
> A possible plan could be:
> 1. Rework meson as explained in [b] above.
> 2. reword types in qcom where necessary to avoid name clashes (add
> "_qcom" extension for ex)
> 3. Move the clk_regmap implementation out of meson to drivers/clk
> 4. Things are yours to play with ...
>
> I can take care of 1. and 3. I would welcome help for 2. especially since
> I won't be able to test it.
>
Hi Stephen,
What do you think of the proposition above ?
There rework is going to take some time to do. I'll start only if this
OK with you.
Cheers
Jerome
>>
>> regards,
>> Marc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 11:34 Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-28 11:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: mux: " Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-28 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: fractional-divider: " Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-05-28 11:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: gate: " Peng Fan (OSS)
2021-06-02 8:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] clk: " Stephen Boyd
2021-06-02 8:21 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-06-02 8:40 ` Peng Fan
2021-06-02 9:32 ` Jerome Brunet
2021-06-18 14:30 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2021-07-27 0:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-06-02 8:39 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1jzgvnfdng.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®