From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: randy.dunlap@intel.com (Dunlap, Randy)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB init order dependencies.
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 07:26:41 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200011070726.eA77QfC20051@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5E932F578EBD111AC3F00A0C96B1E6F07DBDC46@orsmsx31.jf.intel.com> from "Dunlap, Randy" at Nov 06, 2000 03:53:26 PM
Dunlap, Randy writes:
> I'm not following your argument very well. I've read it
> and reread it several times.
> Does adding a call to usb_init() in init/main.c cause
> USB to be init 2 times?
No. As I said elsewhere in this thread, the USB OHCI chip is not accessible
until other board-specific initialisation has happened. This is done via an
initcall. Unfortunately, moving usb_init() back into init/main.c will mean
that USB is again initialised before any initcalls, which means for these
boards USB will be non-functional without additional changes over and above
just moving usb_init().
I hope this helps you understand the problem.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-06 23:53 Dunlap, Randy
2000-11-07 7:26 ` Russell King [this message]
2000-11-07 18:27 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-07 19:02 Dunlap, Randy
2000-11-07 18:48 Dunlap, Randy
2000-11-07 18:50 ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-05 1:36 Dunlap, Randy
2000-11-05 10:03 ` Russell King
2000-10-31 18:10 Dunlap, Randy
2000-11-03 10:38 ` Russell King
2000-11-04 8:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-04 14:38 ` Russell King
2000-11-04 15:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-10-31 17:58 David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200011070726.eA77QfC20051@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®