From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pentium IV-summary
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:47:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001108214759.D17544@khan.acc.umu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <379322493.973714466779.JavaMail.root@web346-wra.mail.com> <8ucdg5$npt$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ucdg5$npt$1@cesium.transmeta.com>; from hpa@zytor.com on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:36:21PM -0800
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:36:21PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <379322493.973714466779.JavaMail.root@web346-wra.mail.com>
> By author: Frank Davis <fdavis112@juno.com>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > 2. There's a bug in get_model_name(),
> > cpuid(0x80000001, &dummy, &dummy, &dummy, &(c->x86_capability));
> >
> > that overwrites the capability state. It will be fixed in 2.2.18 by
> > Dave Jones. Should we also look at Peter Anvin's fix for the problem
> > that Linus mentioned? What are the other features of the Pentium IV
> > should be included in the kernel pending the capability state fix?
> >
>
> I'm working on a revamp of the i386 CPUID detection code, which will
> fix this problem as a side effect.
Is this revamp only for processors that actually support the
CPUID-instruction, or will you fix the CPU-detection for non-CPUID
processors too?! There are quite a few processors that can be detected
properly but aren't (for instance, IBM 486slc/slc2/slc3)
/David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-08 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-08 20:14 Frank Davis
2000-11-08 20:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-08 20:47 ` David Weinehall [this message]
2000-11-08 22:45 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-09 0:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-09 0:46 ` Prasanna P Subash
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-08 20:14 Frank Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001108214759.D17544@khan.acc.umu.se \
--to=tao@acc.umu.se \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®