Re: Where is it written?

[Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>]

[Peter Anvin]
> At the time the original x86 ABI was created, a lot of C code was
> still K&R, and thus prototypes didn't exist...

True enough.  That does explain a lot.  But what about the Alpha?  From
reading gcc source awhile back I seem to remember that most if not all
parameters are passed in registers.  How does *that* work with varargs
and no prototypes?  Or does it?

> I don't think we want to introduce a new ABI in user space at this
> time.  If we ever have to major-rev the ABI (libc.so.7), then we
> should consider this.

Ah, but kernel-side?  My point was that if gcc (and binutils) is
flexible enough to let you pick an ABI at runtime, perhaps a RISCoid
ABI for x86 could coexist with the SysV one, to be used initially for
self-contained code like the kernel.  (And later, a possible transition
in userspace.)

Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/