From: Jan Rekorajski <baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:20:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001128222040.H2680@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001128214309.F2680@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> <200011282111.eASLB6k05926@hawking.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <200011282111.eASLB6k05926@hawking.suse.de>; from schwab@suse.de on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:11:07PM +0100
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jan Rekorajski <baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> writes:
>
> |> Why is RLIMIT_NPROC apllied to root(uid 0) processes? It's not kernel job to
> |> prevent admin from shooting him/her self in the foot.
> |>
> |> root should be able to do fork() regardless of any limits,
> |> and IMHO the following patch is the right thing.
>
> AFAICS, _all_ resource limits are equally applied to root processes. Why
> should NPROC be different?
Because you want to be able to `kill <pid>`?
And if you are over-limits you can't?
Jan
--
Jan Rękorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, type MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-28 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-28 20:43 Jan Rekorajski
2000-11-28 20:52 ` Tigran Aivazian
2000-11-28 20:58 ` Tigran Aivazian
2000-11-28 21:11 ` Jan Rekorajski
2000-11-30 0:00 ` Pavel Machek
2000-11-30 21:24 ` Jan Rekorajski
2000-11-30 21:57 ` Tigran Aivazian
2000-11-28 21:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2000-11-28 21:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2000-11-28 21:20 ` Jan Rekorajski [this message]
2000-11-28 21:58 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-28 22:13 ` Frank v Waveren
2000-11-28 23:23 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-11-28 21:54 ` Alan Cox
2000-11-29 0:34 ` Jan Rekorajski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001128222040.H2680@sith.mimuw.edu.pl \
--to=baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®