mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	V Ganesh <ganesh@veritas.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-LVM@sistina.com,
	mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [bug] infinite loop in generic_make_request()
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:54:19 -0700 (MST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200011302154.eAULsJZ02315@webber.adilger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001130214121.D18804@athlon.random> "from Andrea Arcangeli at Nov 30, 2000 09:41:21 pm"

Andrea writes:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:05:53PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > the RAID and LVM make_request functions should be changed to do that
> > instead (i.e. 0 on success, -ve on error, and maybe "1" if they do their
> > own recursion to break the loop)?
> 
> We preferred to let the lowlevel drivers to handle error themselfs to
> simplify the interface. The lowlevel driver needs to call buffer_IO_error
> before returning in case of error.

Even if the lowlevel driver handles the error case, it would still
make more sense to stick with the normal kernel practise of -ERROR,
and 0 for success.  Then, if in the future we can do something with the
error codes, at least we don't have to change the interface yet again.
Also, it is a bit confusing, because the lvm (and md, I suppose) driver
returned "0" for success in 2.2, so now you need to special-case the
return value depending on kernel version, if you want to keep the same
code for 2.2 and 2.4.

Cheers, Andreas
-- 
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-11-30 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-30  7:02 V Ganesh
2000-11-30  9:24 ` [PATCH] " Neil Brown
2000-11-30 20:05   ` Andreas Dilger
2000-11-30 20:41     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-30 21:54       ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2000-11-30 22:17         ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200011302154.eAULsJZ02315@webber.adilger.net \
    --to=adilger@turbolinux.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=ganesh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-LVM@sistina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®